Skip to content

Conversation

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 16, 2026
@jrvaldes jrvaldes changed the title Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config [release-4.18] Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@jrvaldes jrvaldes marked this pull request as ready for review January 16, 2026 17:41
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jan 16, 2026
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira-cherrypick OCPBUGS-68362

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jrvaldes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 16, 2026
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-68362

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jrvaldes: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68362 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73930. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle OCPBUGS-73930: [release-4.18] Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config

Details

In response to this:

/jira cherry-pick OCPBUGS-68362

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.18] Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config OCPBUGS-73930: [release-4.18] Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jrvaldes: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73930, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.18.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.18.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68362 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-68362 targets the "4.19.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.19.0, 4.19.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @rrasouli

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

manual backport for

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from rrasouli January 16, 2026 17:47
@jrvaldes jrvaldes changed the title OCPBUGS-73930: [release-4.18] Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config [release-4.18] OCPBUGS-73930: Add APIServer to HybridOverlay config Jan 16, 2026
This commit ensures the hybridOverlay service receives explicitly the
address of the API Server Endpoint along with the cacert to enable
certificate rotation.

 The --bootstrap-kubeconfig flag should be enough but there is a bug
 in OVN-K HybridOverlay [1] where the apiserver and cacert are not extracted
 from the bootstrap information, hence introducing the --k8s-apiserver and
 --k8s-cacert flags as part of the command.

 [1] https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-65856

(cherry picked from commit 6af0569)
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests passed

ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator
ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator
ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade
ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle
ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
Required
ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator
ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/images
ci/prow/images — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator
ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/security
ci/prow/security — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/unit
ci/prow/unit — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator
ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator
ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator
ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator — Job succeeded.                     BaseSHA:b711db3864716f945fccf0c611d7bc0275634c8d
ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere
ci/prow/wicd-unit-vsphere — Job succeeded.

@jrvaldes jrvaldes force-pushed the cherry-pick-3608-to-release-4.18 branch from 4acb271 to 3cebdf1 Compare January 16, 2026 21:06
@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

pushed an update to please the linter

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@jrvaldes: /override requires failed status contexts, check run or a prowjob name to operate on.
The following unknown contexts/checkruns were given:

  • ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade
  • ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator
  • ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Only the following failed contexts/checkruns were expected:

  • ci/prow/ci-bundle-wmco-bundle
  • tide

If you are trying to override a checkrun that has a space in it, you must put a double quote on the context.

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator, ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator, ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator, ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/aws-e2e-operator ci/prow/azure-e2e-operator ci/prow/gcp-e2e-operator ci/prow/nutanix-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade, ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/azure-e2e-upgrade ci/prow/platform-none-vsphere-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator, ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/vsphere-e2e-operator ci/prow/vsphere-proxy-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@jrvaldes
Copy link
Contributor Author

/override ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

@jrvaldes: Overrode contexts on behalf of jrvaldes: ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/vsphere-disconnected-e2e-operator

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sebsoto
Copy link
Contributor

sebsoto commented Jan 16, 2026

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 16, 2026
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 360e4bb into openshift:release-4.18 Jan 16, 2026
21 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jrvaldes: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73930: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-73930 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

manual backport for

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants