Skip to content

upi-gcp-install: enable 'master' name for control plane#9490

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
jstuever:gcp_relax_clustername
Jun 8, 2020
Merged

upi-gcp-install: enable 'master' name for control plane#9490
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
jstuever:gcp_relax_clustername

Conversation

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

@jstuever jstuever commented Jun 4, 2020

This change updates the upi-gcp-install step to be able to use the full
word 'master' in the name of control plane nodes. It maintains
compatiblity with the the older 'm' naming convention by looking at
which one was used in the 05_control_plane.py template.

openshift/installer#3713

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 4, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

qq: is there no way to request the information from the deploymentmanager template that was deployed. i.e all the resources it created?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There likely is, but that's not what is in our documentation. I'd like to make sure we are sticking to documentation as much as possible, since that's the point.

This change updates the upi-gcp-install step to be able to use the full
word 'master' in the name of control plane nodes. It maintains
compatiblity with the the older 'm' naming convention by looking at
which one was used in the 05_control_plane.py template.

openshift/installer#3713
@jstuever jstuever force-pushed the gcp_relax_clustername branch from 2fe600b to 2695133 Compare June 4, 2020 20:40
@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor Author

jstuever commented Jun 5, 2020

/test pj-rehearse

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jstuever: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/rehearse/openshift/installer/master/e2e-gcp-upi 2695133 link /test pj-rehearse
ci/prow/pj-rehearse 2695133 link /test pj-rehearse

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor Author

jstuever commented Jun 5, 2020

Running into the following bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1844613:

Jun 05 16:56:35 ci-op-w41w3lff-42368-qqkxn-m-0.c.openshift-gce-devel-ci.internal hyperkube[1532]: E0605 16:56:35.306854    1532 kubelet_node_status.go:92] Unable to register node "ci-op-w41w3lff-42368-qqkxn-m-0.c.openshift-gce-devel-ci.internal" with API server: Node "ci-op-w41w3lff-42368-qqkxn-m-0.c.openshift-gce-devel-ci.internal" is invalid: metadata.labels: Invalid value: "ci-op-w41w3lff-42368-qqkxn-m-0.c.openshift-gce-devel-ci.internal": must be no more than 63 characters

PR openshift/installer#3713 is designed to work around this bug, but it requires this PR to merge first.

@abhinavdahiya
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: abhinavdahiya, jstuever

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit cf9f3eb into openshift:master Jun 8, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jstuever: Updated the following 2 configmaps:

  • step-registry configmap in namespace ci at cluster api.ci using the following files:
    • key upi-install-gcp-commands.sh using file ci-operator/step-registry/upi/install/gcp/upi-install-gcp-commands.sh
  • step-registry configmap in namespace ci at cluster app.ci using the following files:
    • key upi-install-gcp-commands.sh using file ci-operator/step-registry/upi/install/gcp/upi-install-gcp-commands.sh
Details

In response to this:

This change updates the upi-gcp-install step to be able to use the full
word 'master' in the name of control plane nodes. It maintains
compatiblity with the the older 'm' naming convention by looking at
which one was used in the 05_control_plane.py template.

openshift/installer#3713

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@jstuever jstuever deleted the gcp_relax_clustername branch June 8, 2020 16:55
jstuever added a commit to jstuever/release that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2020
This change updates the upi-gcp-install step to be able to use the full
word 'worker' in the name of compute nodes. It maintains
compatiblity with the the older 'w' naming convention by looking at
if 'm' or 'master' is used in control_plane.py per openshift#9490.

openshift/installer#3713
openshift#9490
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants