-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
prepare for new parameterized test image job template #4425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd prefer from as the key name to parallel the container test type and would not expect people to need to specify stable -- that's an internal detail
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as you wish i guess, but i think my name choice offers more context to an inexperienced observer/reader of the file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated openshift/ci-tools#24 w/ this change, and updated this PR to reflect it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this whole thing should be resolved locally with image lookup, no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hm?
|
/retest |
1 similar comment
|
/retest |
|
@stevekuznetsov i think you lied to me:
I can see the env var defined on the ci-operator pod: but ci-operator does not seem to have passed it to the template as a parameter. |
|
(Clayton did confirm this is supposed to work, so i'll dig in some more on what dots i may have failed to connect) |
|
@bparees: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@stevekuznetsov ok i'm stuck again..I do not see why this is failing to provide the required parameter: when i am clearly setting the env var here: possible pj-rehearse bug? |
|
/test pj-rehearse |
stevekuznetsov
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/approve
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, stevekuznetsov The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@bparees: Updated the
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
depends on openshift/ci-tools#24