Skip to content

Conversation

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

@smarterclayton smarterclayton commented Apr 5, 2019

Failures reported cloning after the bump:

{"command":"git fetch https://github.com./openshift/openshift-azure.git  --tags --prune","component":"clonerefs","error":"exit status 128","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com./openshift/openshift-azure.git/':  Unable to communicate securely with peer: requested domain name does not match the server's certificate.\n","time":"2019-04-05T21:19:52Z"}

Reverts only sidecar container images from #3366

…nit-upload)

Failures reported cloning after the bump:

```
{"command":"git fetch https://github.com./openshift/openshift-azure.git  --tags --prune","component":"clonerefs","error":"exit status 128","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com./openshift/openshift-azure.git/':  Unable to communicate securely with peer: requested domain name does not match the server's certificate.\n","time":"2019-04-05T21:19:52Z"}
```
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Apr 5, 2019
@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 5, 2019
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

Had at least 3 jobs pass after this selective revert. Will monitor in case endpoint/sidecar/init-upload shouldn't have been rolled back (I rolled all pod utilities back as a unit just for safety).

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Apr 5, 2019

/lgtm

(cross-link #3366 in a way that GitHub will render there ;)

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: smarterclayton, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ba94931 into openshift:master Apr 5, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@smarterclayton: Updated the config configmap in namespace ci using the following files:

  • key config.yaml using file cluster/ci/config/prow/config.yaml
Details

In response to this:

Failures reported cloning after the bump:

{"command":"git fetch https://github.com./openshift/openshift-azure.git  --tags --prune","component":"clonerefs","error":"exit status 128","level":"info","msg":"Ran command","output":"fatal: unable to access 'https://github.com./openshift/openshift-azure.git/':  Unable to communicate securely with peer: requested domain name does not match the server's certificate.\n","time":"2019-04-05T21:19:52Z"}

Reverts only sidecar container images from #3366

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

wking added a commit to wking/openshift-release that referenced this pull request Apr 6, 2019
Showing how the recent run of 'could not wait for build' errors
correlates nicely with a break in [1] followed by a fix in [2].

[1]: openshift#3366
[2]: openshift#3369
@smarterclayton smarterclayton deleted the revert_clonerefs branch April 24, 2019 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants