-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
ci-operator/step-registry/baremetalds/devscripts/setup: Set OPENSHIFT_UPGRADE_RELEASE_IMAGE #25123
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
wking
wants to merge
1
commit into
openshift:master
from
wking:expose-update-target-release-to-bare-metal-install-step
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Any specific reason to define a new distinct var? I guess we could reuse
release/ci-operator/step-registry/baremetalds/e2e/upgrade/baremetalds-e2e-upgrade-workflow.yaml
Line 12 in b817dee
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think
OVERRIDEis all that appropriate here. I felt strongly enough to break from tradition with my new variable, but not strongly enough to try and update existing variables.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this could be a problematic duplication, given that the upgrade workflow already defined the
OPENSHIFT_UPGRADE_RELEASE_IMAGE_OVERRIDEvar (note: this was taken from the standard openshift e2e test step, as in future we'd like to use it directly) to specify the target release for the upgrade.On the dev-scripts side of course there will be more choice for the naming of the exported configuration variable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One day I'll get those steps moved too by reviving #12959. I just haven't been able to track down approvers yet. Anyhow, having the scripts prefer one and fall back to another is pretty easy:
But also, this is not my step, so feel free to file alternative PRs with whatever handling makes the most sense to you; no need to just follow my preferences ;)