Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think all of the &&s are unnecessary now, since this line always succeeds. It'd be significantly easier to read without them.
Also it's a bit weird to print 'Error' for something that isn't actually an error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I totally agree all of your comments @zaneb. Our intention was to be similar with other workflows in here
release/ci-operator/step-registry/openshift/e2e/test/openshift-e2e-test-commands.sh
Line 239 in 30d7dab
But I think, we can remove
&&and change the message fromErrorto somethingInfo.What do you think @andfasano ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, but given that our long-term goal is to adopt directly the
openshift-e2e-teststep (and abandonbaremetalds-e2-testone - also PR #19987 goes in that direction), any discrepancy - not baremetal specific - introduced now will make more painful to merge our changes into theopenshift-e2e-testwhen we'll be ready to do it.So in this PR I'll stick as much as possible closer to the
openshift-e2e-teststep for whatever is not baremetal specific - and eventually address later any improvement directly in that step once we'll get it.