-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Move upgrade-rollback job to use step registry #13957
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move upgrade-rollback job to use step registry #13957
Conversation
|
/uncc |
f075a0a to
55f4c60
Compare
|
@alvaroaleman , I think it's ready now, but it's failing pj-rehearse which I think is expected at this point. You noted in another PR I have that UNRESOLVED_CONFIG doesn't work for pj-rehearse now and that there is a PR to get that working. I think it's this I'm hoping that moving this job to step registry will possibly give us more logs in order to debug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893348 |
|
/retest |
55f4c60 to
3974475
Compare
|
/retest |
3974475 to
4b5dcfb
Compare
|
/test pj-rehearse |
It looks like pj-rehearse is working for UNRESOLVED_CONFIG now, but I'm running in to something I don't understand. The first job that ran when there were no quotes around version_bounds values: most recent job that looks the same to me: here is the current lines in the PR that have the quotes: @alvaroaleman or @stevekuznetsov, any idea what I'm missing here? |
|
/test pj-rehearse |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
abort-at here means "after 99 mins of waiting start an upgrade back to original release". Please update the docs accordingly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wasn't exactly sure what 99 quantified, but I did find this:
https://github.com/openshift/openshift-tests/blob/e0d37add24c5dfc34497ad334abc6f02be96312a/cmd/extended-platform-tests/openshift-tests.go#L158
is it 99m or 99%. still learning here.
vrutkovs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only skimmed through the PR, but how is it different from other openshift-upgrade workflows? Can we re-use the exising one and set TEST_OPTIONS instead?
Thanks for the review. Yes, I would totally rather re-use the normal upgrade workflows. I didn't think to find a way to put TEST_OPTIONS in the job definition and it would be overwritten in the upgrade workflow. If that works, it would be much better. |
4b5dcfb to
2e1f431
Compare
@vrutkovs, how does it look now? I'm having trouble with the pj-rehearse job though. It seems like it's not actually using the changes from this PR to run that job. |
|
Looks good! IIRC |
ada320a to
bef98d0
Compare
Signed-off-by: Jamo Luhrsen <[email protected]>
bef98d0 to
0978acd
Compare
|
@jluhrsen: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: AlexNPavel, jluhrsen The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@jluhrsen: Updated the following 2 configmaps:
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Signed-off-by: Jamo Luhrsen [email protected]