Skip to content

Conversation

@mjudeikis
Copy link
Contributor

Add e2e origin test to OSA cluster

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 6, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 7, 2018
@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch 5 times, most recently from 6a008de to f4665eb Compare September 10, 2018 10:43
@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 10, 2018
@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch from f4665eb to 813c710 Compare September 10, 2018 10:44
@openshift-bot openshift-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 10, 2018
@mjudeikis mjudeikis changed the title [wip] add osa e2e test via base images add osa origin conformance e2e test via base images Sep 10, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 10, 2018
@mjudeikis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Kargakis @jim-minter ready for first review

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why not use the upstream openshift/origin-tests image?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

need to check it if it does what we need to do. Never used it.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The image does not container uncompiled tests and code :/ does not work for us. it does not even has go in it.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It doesn't need to have go, does it? It should contain a binary with all the Origin conformance tests.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hmmm. found them ./ginkgo extended.test need to check if it contains all what we need. would be good to swap

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

remove

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not needed?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why is this needed?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comment needs update

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this valid now?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think so. But in different form :) will move

@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch from 813c710 to 49ee40b Compare September 10, 2018 13:01
@openshift-bot openshift-bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 10, 2018
@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch from 49ee40b to eba71db Compare September 10, 2018 13:03
@openshift-bot openshift-bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 10, 2018
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs to be changed to master.yaml.

We have mass-renamed all ci-operator configuration files from .json to .yaml in #1336, because YAML is what ci-operator consumes now. JSON is a YAML subset so that the actual file content can stay like it is (we'll eventually mass-reformat them to the block style).

@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch from eba71db to b95c19b Compare September 10, 2018 13:25
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/is/are/

@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch 2 times, most recently from 06d45d4 to fabba7b Compare September 10, 2018 14:52
@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch from fabba7b to bcb2e82 Compare September 10, 2018 14:54
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
kind: Template
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do you have cluster-launch-e2e-azure and cluster-launch-e2e-azure-conformance?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The first is meant to run openshift on azure specific e2e tests, the second is meant to run the origin conformance suite on a cluster deployed on azure.

@mjudeikis mjudeikis force-pushed the feature/osa-e2e-test-boilerplate branch from b1ea847 to 6e83522 Compare September 10, 2018 19:06
@0xmichalis
Copy link
Contributor

Let's see what falls out and fix it

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 10, 2018
@0xmichalis 0xmichalis added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 10, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: kargakis, mjudeikis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit f941165 into openshift:master Sep 10, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@mjudeikis: Updated the following 4 configmaps:

  • prow-job-cluster-launch-e2e-azure configmap using the following files:
    • key cluster-launch-e2e-azure.yaml using file ci-operator/templates/openshift-azure/cluster-launch-e2e-azure.yaml
  • plugins configmap using the following files:
    • key plugins.yaml using file cluster/ci/config/prow/plugins.yaml
  • job-config configmap using the following files:
    • key openshift-openshift-azure-presubmits.yaml using file ci-operator/jobs/openshift/openshift-azure/openshift-openshift-azure-presubmits.yaml
  • prow-job-cluster-launch-e2e-azure-upgrade configmap using the following files:
    • key cluster-launch-e2e-azure-upgrade.yaml using file ci-operator/templates/openshift-azure/cluster-launch-e2e-azure-upgrade.yaml
Details

In response to this:

Add e2e origin test to OSA cluster

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

derekhiggins pushed a commit to derekhiggins/release that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2023
It was changed from master to main recently
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants