Skip to content

Conversation

@dtfranz
Copy link
Contributor

@dtfranz dtfranz commented Jun 28, 2023

No description provided.

dtfranz and others added 3 commits June 12, 2023 12:12
Removes rukpak manifests from platform-operators repo.

Signed-off-by: dtfranz <dfranz@redhat.com>
…s+related objects

Signed-off-by: dtfranz <dfranz@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 28, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 28, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@ncdc ncdc marked this pull request as ready for review July 5, 2023 18:05
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 5, 2023
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from awgreene and tmshort July 5, 2023 18:15
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 5, 2023

@dtfranz: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Copy link

@tmshort tmshort left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I ignored the vendor directory.
/lgtm

if err := c.Get(ctx, types.NamespacedName{Name: clusteroperator.AggregateResourceName}, co); err != nil {
return false, err
}
return len(co.Status.RelatedObjects) == 4, nil
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Too bad this can't be an enumeration or calculated value.

@tmshort
Copy link

tmshort commented Jul 5, 2023

/approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 5, 2023
@joelanford
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 6, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dtfranz, joelanford, tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 6, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ef925d2 into main Jul 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants