Skip to content

Comments

[release-4.8] Bug 2043757: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods#922

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.8from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-886-to-release-4.8
Feb 9, 2022
Merged

[release-4.8] Bug 2043757: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods#922
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.8from
openshift-cherrypick-robot:cherry-pick-886-to-release-4.8

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #886

/assign alexanderConstantinescu

Legacy commit using ovn-nbctl for the implementation. This commit will
be used for backports to older versions.

The host network couldn't connect to services backed by egress IP
matching pods since the return packets would get forwarded to the egress
nodes for these pods because of the routing policies specified for the
egress matching pods. This would in turn break the connection. Hence
what we need is to specify routing policies which forces the packet to
go to the originating GR instead of getting routed to the egress node
GR.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Constantinescu <aconstan@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 993e7d2)
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 21, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 2034669 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 2043757. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.8] Bug 2043757: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 2034669: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.8] Bug 2034669: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods [release-4.8] Bug 2043757: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods Jan 21, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jan 21, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 21, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2043757, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.8.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.8.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2034669 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2034669 targets the "4.9.z" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.9.0, 4.9.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 2043757: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@alexanderConstantinescu
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 21, 2022
@squeed
Copy link
Contributor

squeed commented Jan 26, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 26, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alexanderConstantinescu, openshift-cherrypick-robot, squeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 26, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

12 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor

flavio-fernandes commented Feb 8, 2022

hello @zhaozhanqi. Can you look into adding the cherry-pick-approved label to this pr, please?
This is a cherry-pick of pr #886 which I think you looked into before.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

6 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@zhaozhanqi
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Feb 9, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration 7f4343f link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-to-local-gateway-mode-migration
ci/prow/4.8-upgrade-from-stable-4.7-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 7f4343f link false /test 4.8-upgrade-from-stable-4.7-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit ab65e3a into openshift:release-4.8 Feb 9, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 9, 2022

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2043757 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.8] Bug 2043757: Fix node connectivity to service backed by egress IP pods

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants