Skip to content

[release-4.20] OCPBUGS-77148: Minimize ACLs by combining ipBlocks into single ACL#2981

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.20from
pperiyasamy:np_reduce_acl_ipblock_4.20
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

[release-4.20] OCPBUGS-77148: Minimize ACLs by combining ipBlocks into single ACL#2981
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 1 commit intoopenshift:release-4.20from
pperiyasamy:np_reduce_acl_ipblock_4.20

Conversation

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@pperiyasamy pperiyasamy commented Feb 16, 2026

Manual cherry-pick of 4.21 commit 21ef647 from PR #2995.

Resolved conflicts in go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy_test.go for deriving ACL's action.

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/payload 4.20 ci blocking
/payload 4.20 nightly blocking

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Feb 17, 2026

@pperiyasamy: trigger 5 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.20

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-aks
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a6201d40-0bd8-11f1-8e1b-367a91ffcc0d-0

trigger 13 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.20

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-3of3
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-fips
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.20-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.20-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-bm
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.20-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a6201d40-0bd8-11f1-8e1b-367a91ffcc0d-1

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/retest

@mrobson
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mrobson commented Feb 17, 2026

/retest ci/prow/images

@mrobson
Copy link
Copy Markdown

mrobson commented Feb 17, 2026

/test images

Combine all ipBlocks in a NetworkPolicy rule into single
ACL instead of creating one ACL per ipBlock.
This reduces ACL bloat when policy having multiple ipBlocks
for ingress/egress rules.

Signed-off-by: Periyasamy Palanisamy <pepalani@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit fd27015)
(cherry picked from commit 14b7309)
(cherry picked from commit 21ef647)
@pperiyasamy pperiyasamy force-pushed the np_reduce_acl_ipblock_4.20 branch from 853de36 to 8336fa0 Compare February 23, 2026 08:52
@pperiyasamy pperiyasamy changed the title [DNM] [release-4.20] Minimize ACLs by combining ipBlocks into single ACL [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-77148: Minimize ACLs by combining ipBlocks into single ACL Feb 23, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 23, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pperiyasamy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77148, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77147 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but it is New instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest-required

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/tide refresh

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest-required

@liqcui
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

liqcui commented Mar 3, 2026

/verified by @liqcui

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Mar 3, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@liqcui: This PR has been marked as verified by @liqcui.

Details

In response to this:

/verified by @liqcui

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 3, 2026
@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-upgrade-ovn-single-node
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.20-upgrade-from-stable-4.19-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 4, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 4, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jcaamano, pperiyasamy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 4, 2026
@jcaamano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jcaamano commented Mar 4, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-77499

@jcaamano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jcaamano commented Mar 4, 2026

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 4, 2026

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-77499

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 4, 2026

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes
associated thread: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C020CKMP6CT/p1771508205301039?thread_ts=1771101156.062779&cid=C020CKMP6CT and https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/GQ0CU2623/p1771848596455029?thread_ts=1771338827.722999&cid=GQ0CU2623
plausible fix: kube-burner/kube-burner-ocp#399

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 5, 2026
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@arkadeepsen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77148, which is valid.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77147 is in the state Verified, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77147 targets the "4.21.z" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0, 4.21.z
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested a review from anuragthehatter March 5, 2026 13:31
@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/retest-required

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw

@arkadeepsen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

/test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

@jcaamano
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jcaamano commented Mar 6, 2026

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 6, 2026

@jcaamano: Overrode contexts on behalf of jcaamano: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones, ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
/override ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Mar 6, 2026

@pperiyasamy: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 8336fa0 link false /test security
ci/prow/qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes 8336fa0 link true /test qe-perfscale-payload-control-plane-6nodes
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones 8336fa0 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot Bot merged commit 304bd93 into openshift:release-4.20 Mar 6, 2026
28 of 29 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pperiyasamy: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77148
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-77148 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Manual cherry-pick of 4.21 commit 21ef647 from PR #2995.

Resolved conflicts in go-controller/pkg/ovn/policy_test.go for deriving ACL's action.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. jira/severity-critical Referenced Jira bug's severity is critical for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.