Skip to content

OCPBUGS-15538,OCPBUGS-19961: Downstream merge 2023-10-10#1935

Merged
openshift-ci[bot] merged 10 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
pperiyasamy:merge-11-10-2023
Oct 17, 2023
Merged

OCPBUGS-15538,OCPBUGS-19961: Downstream merge 2023-10-10#1935
openshift-ci[bot] merged 10 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
pperiyasamy:merge-11-10-2023

Conversation

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Member

pperiyasamy and others added 8 commits October 6, 2023 10:44
This would synchronize node primary address update on the address
manager which helps to avoid unnecessary update of the same ovn
encapsulation ip address into ovs.

Signed-off-by: Periyasamy Palanisamy <pepalani@redhat.com>
Not sure if this case can ever happen, but if we ever get to this code
and have no gateways, we want to delete the pod IP from the policy.
Just make this safer by checking if 0 or 1 gws are present in the cache,
rather than just 1.

Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <trozet@redhat.com>
Hybrid route policies were not unconditionally removed if there was not
a matching ECMP route in OVN. This changes the behavior to fully clean
hybrid policies as well as any stale addresses that exist in its related
address set.

Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <trozet@redhat.com>
Co-authored-by: Nadia Pinaeva <npinaeva@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Rozet <trozet@redhat.com>
…g net-attach-def

This change is to prevent Type Assertion panic in case
the object has already been removed but was put into
tombstone of type cache.DeletedFinalStateUnknown which
contains the deleted key and object

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-19961

Signed-off-by: Arnab Ghosh <arnabghosh89@gmail.com>
@pperiyasamy pperiyasamy requested a review from dcbw as a code owner October 10, 2023 15:44
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 10, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pperiyasamy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15538, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

@npinaeva @trozet

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

trozet and others added 2 commits October 10, 2023 17:23
@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Member Author

/assign @npinaeva @trozet @tssurya

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 11, 2023

/retitle OCPBUGS-15538,OCPBUGS-19961: Downstream merge 2023-10-10

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title OCPBUGS-15538: Downstream merge 2023-10-10 OCPBUGS-15538,OCPBUGS-19961: Downstream merge 2023-10-10 Oct 11, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 11, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pperiyasamy: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15538, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19961, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.15.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

@npinaeva @trozet

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 11, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 11, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@tssurya: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15538, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19961, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.15.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.15.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @anuragthehatter

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 11, 2023

/retest

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 12, 2023

I see disruptions again https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/origin-ci-test/pr-logs/pull/openshift_ovn-kubernetes/1935/pull-ci-openshift-ovn-kubernetes-master-4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade/1712369089361481728 and

{  fail [github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/prometheus/prometheus.go:577]: Unexpected error:
    <errors.aggregate | len:1, cap:1>: 
    promQL query returned unexpected results:
    ALERTS{alertname!~"Watchdog|AlertmanagerReceiversNotConfigured|PrometheusRemoteWriteDesiredShards|KubeJobFailed|Watchdog|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|KubePodNotReady|etcdMembersDown|etcdMembersDown|etcdGRPCRequestsSlow|etcdGRPCRequestsSlow|etcdHighNumberOfFailedGRPCRequests|etcdHighNumberOfFailedGRPCRequests|etcdMemberCommunicationSlow|etcdMemberCommunicationSlow|etcdNoLeader|etcdNoLeader|etcdHighFsyncDurations|etcdHighFsyncDurations|etcdHighCommitDurations|etcdHighCommitDurations|etcdInsufficientMembers|etcdInsufficientMembers|etcdHighNumberOfLeaderChanges|etcdHighNumberOfLeaderChanges|KubeAPIErrorBudgetBurn|KubeAPIErrorBudgetBurn|KubeClientErrors|KubeClientErrors|KubePersistentVolumeErrors|KubePersistentVolumeErrors|MCDDrainError|MCDDrainError|KubeMemoryOvercommit|KubeMemoryOvercommit|MCDPivotError|MCDPivotError|PrometheusOperatorWatchErrors|PrometheusOperatorWatchErrors|OVNKubernetesResourceRetryFailure|OVNKubernetesResourceRetryFailure|RedhatOperatorsCatalogError|RedhatOperatorsCatalogError|VSphereOpenshiftNodeHealthFail|VSphereOpenshiftNodeHealthFail|SamplesImagestreamImportFailing|SamplesImagestreamImportFailing|PodSecurityViolation",alertstate="firing",severity!="info"} >= 1
    [
      {
        "metric": {
          "__name__": "ALERTS",
          "alertname": "TargetDown",
          "alertstate": "firing",
          "job": "cco-metrics",
          "namespace": "openshift-cloud-credential-operator",
          "prometheus": "openshift-monitoring/k8s",
          "service": "cco-metrics",
          "severity": "warning"
        },
        "value": [
          1697105377.751,
          "1"
        ]
      }

on both upgrades which seem unrelated.
the disruptions might need a close look @pperiyasamy

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 12, 2023

/retest

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Member Author

@tssurya it seems this disruption is not related to this change, it happened with PR #1702 as well and succeeded in the last run. so would try for another /retest.

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 13, 2023

/retest

@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 16, 2023

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 16, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 16, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: pperiyasamy, trozet

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 16, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1cf6c03 and 2 for PR HEAD bb6a2b2 in total

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented Oct 17, 2023

/retest-required

2 similar comments
@pperiyasamy
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@trozet
Copy link
Contributor

trozet commented Oct 17, 2023

/retest-required

@flavio-fernandes
Copy link
Contributor

/test e2e-aws-ovn-kubevirt
/cc @flavio-fernandes

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit 30f8cef into openshift:master Oct 17, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@pperiyasamy: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15538: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-15538 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19961: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-19961 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

@npinaeva @trozet

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Fix included in accepted release 4.15.0-0.nightly-2023-10-24-230302

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/severity-moderate Referenced Jira bug's severity is moderate for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants