Skip to content

Conversation

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member

Reverts #30467

Like #30465, these tests are resulting in mass failures of other MCO tests in 4.20, making this revert necessary.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 8, 2025

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references OCPNODE-3912 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #30467

Like #30465, these tests are resulting in mass failures of other MCO tests in 4.20, making this revert necessary.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and jwmatthews December 8, 2025 18:25
@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen changed the title Revert "OCPNODE-3912: Add a test for NodeSizing default change to OCP 4.20" [release-4.20] OCPBUGS-66979: Revert "OCPNODE-3912: Add a test for NodeSizing default change to OCP 4.20" Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.z" version, but no target version was set
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #30467

Like #30465, these tests are resulting in mass failures of other MCO tests in 4.20, making this revert necessary.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 8, 2025
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979, which is invalid:

  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.21.0 and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.z) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.z)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note type set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66964 is in the state Closed (Done), which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA))
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66964 targets the "4.21.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.21.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sergiordlr December 8, 2025 18:44
@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@isabella-janssen
Copy link
Member Author

/verified bypass

This is a revert to a known good state, so no additional verification in necessary.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: The verified label has been added.

Details

In response to this:

/verified bypass

This is a revert to a known good state, so no additional verification in necessary.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

@isabella-janssen: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

dgoodwin commented Dec 9, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dgoodwin, isabella-janssen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 9, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 75ff26f into openshift:release-4.20 Dec 9, 2025
17 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@isabella-janssen: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979
✔️ This pull request was pre-merge verified.
✔️ All associated pull requests have merged.
✔️ All associated, merged pull requests were pre-merge verified.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-66979 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓

Details

In response to this:

Reverts #30467

Like #30465, these tests are resulting in mass failures of other MCO tests in 4.20, making this revert necessary.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@isabella-janssen isabella-janssen deleted the revert-30467-ngopalak/release-4.20-test branch December 9, 2025 14:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants