Skip to content

Conversation

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

@kevinrizza kevinrizza commented Aug 11, 2025

Unskips the tests that were skipped pending their implementations that have since been implemented via openshift/cluster-authentication-operator#740 and openshift/kubernetes#2353

Supersedes #30082

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Aug 11, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 11, 2025

@kevinrizza: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-945 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Unskips the tests that were skipped pending their implementations that have since been implemented via openshift/cluster-authentication-operator#740 and openshift/kubernetes#2353

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ibihim and ingvagabund August 11, 2025 14:47
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@liouk
Copy link
Member

liouk commented Aug 12, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2025

@kevinrizza: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 8cba85d link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2 8cba85d link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview 8cba85d link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2 8cba85d link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn 8cba85d link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 8cba85d link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-azure 8cba85d link false /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 8cba85d link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 8cba85d link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 8cba85d link false /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi 8cba85d link false /test e2e-gcp-csi
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade 8cba85d link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 12, 2025

@kevinrizza: This pull request references CNTRLPLANE-945 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Unskips the tests that were skipped pending their implementations that have since been implemented via openshift/cluster-authentication-operator#740 and openshift/kubernetes#2353

Supersedes #30082

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

held until #30094 merges to resolve console issue

@sjenning
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

per @kevinrizza comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 12, 2025
@sjenning sjenning added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 12, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: kevinrizza, liouk

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 13, 2025
@kevinrizza
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@sdodson sdodson merged commit a4bf0d0 into openshift:main Aug 13, 2025
31 of 47 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants