Skip to content

Conversation

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor

@melvinjoseph86 melvinjoseph86 commented Apr 23, 2025

For the enhancement of gatewayapicontroller test cases we need to add a function 'AdminIngressClient' in util/client.go which will be used in accessing the gateway DNS records. This addition causes the bumping vendor dependencies in this commit.

JIRA: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/NE-2031

Adding two more function:-
assertDNSRecordStatus - assertDNSRecordStatus polls until the DNSRecord's status in the default operand namespace is True.
assertHttpRouteConnection - assertHttpRouteConnection checks if the http route of the given name replies successfully, and returns an error if not

Runner logs:-

  [sig-network-edge][OCPFeatureGate:GatewayAPIController][Feature:Router][apigroup:gateway.networking.k8s.io] Ensure LB, service, and dnsRecord are created for a Gateway object [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/router/gatewayapicontroller.go:193
    STEP: Creating a kubernetes client @ 04/23/25 11:04:11.117
  I0423 11:04:11.119918   22440 discovery.go:214] Invalidating discovery information
  I0423 11:04:15.209222 22440 client.go:278] configPath is now "/var/folders/7h/zgpvgd5946bcf53ktsvp95_40000gn/T/configfile1811394377"
  I0423 11:04:15.209305 22440 client.go:327] The user is now "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v-user"
  I0423 11:04:15.209326 22440 client.go:329] Creating project "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v"
  I0423 11:04:15.623140 22440 client.go:337] Waiting on permissions in project "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v" ...
  I0423 11:04:17.156953 22440 client.go:366] DeploymentConfig capability is enabled, adding 'deployer' SA to the list of default SAs
  I0423 11:04:17.458412 22440 client.go:381] Waiting for ServiceAccount "default" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:04:18.181112 22440 client.go:381] Waiting for ServiceAccount "builder" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:04:19.034751 22440 client.go:381] Waiting for ServiceAccount "deployer" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:04:19.749060 22440 client.go:391] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-pullers" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:04:19.749496   22440 reflector.go:313] Starting reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:19.749612   22440 reflector.go:349] Listing and watching *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.430502   22440 reflector.go:376] Caches populated for *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.430618   22440 reflector.go:319] Stopping reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.430669 22440 client.go:391] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-builders" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:04:20.430876   22440 reflector.go:313] Starting reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.430909   22440 reflector.go:349] Listing and watching *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.837964   22440 reflector.go:376] Caches populated for *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.838034   22440 reflector.go:319] Stopping reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.838060 22440 client.go:391] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:deployers" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:04:20.838174   22440 reflector.go:313] Starting reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:20.838182   22440 reflector.go:349] Listing and watching *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:21.129797   22440 reflector.go:376] Caches populated for *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:21.129893   22440 reflector.go:319] Stopping reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:04:21.661409 22440 client.go:424] Project "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v" has been fully provisioned.
    STEP: Ensure default GatewayClass is accepted @ 04/23/25 11:04:21.661
    STEP: Getting the default domain @ 04/23/25 11:04:24.22
    STEP: Create the default Gateway @ 04/23/25 11:04:24.834
  I0423 11:04:27.541680 22440 gatewayapicontroller.go:346] Found gateway but the controller is still not programmed, retrying...
  I0423 11:04:29.521427 22440 gatewayapicontroller.go:341] The gateway controller is up and running
  I0423 11:04:29.521556 22440 gatewayapicontroller.go:353] Gateway is successfully programmed!
    STEP: Verify the gateway's LoadBalancer service and DNSRecords @ 04/23/25 11:04:29.521
  I0423 11:04:29.937862 22440 gatewayapicontroller.go:219] The load balancer External-IP is: a3f65ce63a98b41199d4df03553b7c34-1768473480.us-east-2.elb.amazonaws.com
  I0423 11:04:30.234967 22440 gatewayapicontroller.go:223] The gateway hostname address is a3f65ce63a98b41199d4df03553b7c34-1768473480.us-east-2.elb.amazonaws.com 
  I0423 11:04:33.232101 22440 gatewayapicontroller.go:409] The gateway DNS records created and ready to use
  I0423 11:04:33.609842 22440 client.go:640] Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users  e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v-user}, err: <nil>
  I0423 11:04:33.906956 22440 client.go:640] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients  e2e-client-e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v}, err: <nil>
  I0423 11:04:34.196859 22440 client.go:640] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens  sha256~i5U4YnbllqANU2j2qhCvmvvHLhgO-LykW6cIoZDvSso}, err: <nil>
    STEP: Cleaning up the GatewayAPI Objects @ 04/23/25 11:04:34.199
    STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-t445v" for this suite. @ 04/23/25 11:04:34.766
  • [24.790 seconds]
  ------------------------------

  Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 24.791 seconds
  SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped

  [sig-network-edge][OCPFeatureGate:GatewayAPIController][Feature:Router][apigroup:gateway.networking.k8s.io] Ensure HTTPRoute object is created [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel]
  github.com/openshift/origin/test/extended/router/gatewayapicontroller.go:231
    STEP: Creating a kubernetes client @ 04/23/25 11:11:22.617
  I0423 11:11:22.621137   23106 discovery.go:214] Invalidating discovery information
  I0423 11:11:27.947333 23106 client.go:278] configPath is now "/var/folders/7h/zgpvgd5946bcf53ktsvp95_40000gn/T/configfile3497944257"
  I0423 11:11:27.947425 23106 client.go:327] The user is now "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n-user"
  I0423 11:11:27.947441 23106 client.go:329] Creating project "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n"
  I0423 11:11:28.582048 23106 client.go:337] Waiting on permissions in project "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n" ...
  I0423 11:11:30.266544 23106 client.go:366] DeploymentConfig capability is enabled, adding 'deployer' SA to the list of default SAs
  I0423 11:11:30.821081 23106 client.go:381] Waiting for ServiceAccount "default" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:11:31.535372 23106 client.go:381] Waiting for ServiceAccount "builder" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:11:32.275968 23106 client.go:381] Waiting for ServiceAccount "deployer" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:11:33.026521 23106 client.go:391] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-pullers" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:11:33.027077   23106 reflector.go:313] Starting reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.027181   23106 reflector.go:349] Listing and watching *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.305067   23106 reflector.go:376] Caches populated for *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.305179   23106 reflector.go:319] Stopping reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.305234 23106 client.go:391] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:image-builders" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:11:33.305397   23106 reflector.go:313] Starting reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.305429   23106 reflector.go:349] Listing and watching *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.601001   23106 reflector.go:376] Caches populated for *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.601113   23106 reflector.go:319] Stopping reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.601168 23106 client.go:391] Waiting for RoleBinding "system:deployers" to be provisioned...
  I0423 11:11:33.601398   23106 reflector.go:313] Starting reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.601441   23106 reflector.go:349] Listing and watching *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.890985   23106 reflector.go:376] Caches populated for *v1.RoleBinding from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:33.891082   23106 reflector.go:319] Stopping reflector *v1.RoleBinding (0s) from k8s.io/[email protected]/tools/cache/reflector.go:251
  I0423 11:11:34.466058 23106 client.go:424] Project "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n" has been fully provisioned.
    STEP: Ensure default GatewayClass is accepted @ 04/23/25 11:11:34.466
    STEP: Getting the default domain @ 04/23/25 11:11:36.762
    STEP: Create a custom Gateway for the HTTPRoute @ 04/23/25 11:11:37.08
  I0423 11:11:39.695996 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:346] Found gateway but the controller is still not programmed, retrying...
  I0423 11:11:41.726517 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:341] The gateway controller is up and running
  I0423 11:11:41.726621 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:353] Gateway is successfully programmed!
    STEP: Create the http route using the custom gateway @ 04/23/25 11:11:41.726
    STEP: Checking the http route using the default gateway is accepted @ 04/23/25 11:11:44.335
  I0423 11:11:47.212348 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:582] found httproute e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n/test-httproute with 1 parent/s
  I0423 11:11:47.212466 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:588] httpRoute e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n/test-httproute successful
    STEP: Validating the http connectivity to the backend application @ 04/23/25 11:11:47.212
  I0423 11:11:50.142083 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:409] The gateway DNS records created and ready to use
  I0423 11:12:10.310807 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:620] 2025-04-23 11:12:10.31071 +0530 IST m=+56.108365501 waiting for HTTP route name test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com to resolve (lookup test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com: no such host)
  I0423 11:12:30.146159 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:620] 2025-04-23 11:12:30.146076 +0530 IST m=+75.943581710 waiting for HTTP route name test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com to resolve (lookup test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com: no such host)
  I0423 11:12:50.146422 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:620] 2025-04-23 11:12:50.146339 +0530 IST m=+95.943693751 waiting for HTTP route name test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com to resolve (lookup test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com: no such host)
  I0423 11:13:10.145657 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:620] 2025-04-23 11:13:10.145604 +0530 IST m=+115.942807460 waiting for HTTP route name test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com to resolve (lookup test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com: no such host)
  I0423 11:13:36.153241 23106 gatewayapicontroller.go:640] request to test-hostname.gwapi.gw-custom.bazhou-0423-419-tp.qe.devcluster.openshift.com was successful
  I0423 11:13:37.293798 23106 client.go:640] Deleted {user.openshift.io/v1, Resource=users  e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n-user}, err: <nil>
  I0423 11:13:37.595254 23106 client.go:640] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthclients  e2e-client-e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n}, err: <nil>
  I0423 11:13:37.935066 23106 client.go:640] Deleted {oauth.openshift.io/v1, Resource=oauthaccesstokens  sha256~9K_8iQ3TjP2aAM04b1KscvGV64Db3XXexWROGDRgrXo}, err: <nil>
    STEP: Cleaning up the GatewayAPI Objects @ 04/23/25 11:13:37.937
    STEP: Destroying namespace "e2e-test-gatewayapi-controller-wrb8n" for this suite. @ 04/23/25 11:13:38.719
  • [137.014 seconds]
  ------------------------------

  Ran 1 of 1 Specs in 137.015 seconds
  SUCCESS! -- 1 Passed | 0 Failed | 0 Pending | 0 Skipped

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 23, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 23, 2025

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Apr 23, 2025
@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test all

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ShudiLi @lihongan @rhamini3 Kindly review..

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview
/test all

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: trigger 6 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview
  • periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/b24832f0-20de-11f0-9d6e-86ea7a2c6e88-0

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/40113230-20df-11f0-9754-43ec7977072b-0

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 24, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6f1c1f10-20ec-11f0-89a4-d0208a4749ba-0

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@melvinjoseph86 melvinjoseph86 marked this pull request as ready for review April 24, 2025 12:16
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Apr 24, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from candita and sjenning April 24, 2025 12:18
@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-azure-ovn-techpreview

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/6adee4f0-2178-11f0-9d83-600eabcaefaa-0

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented Apr 25, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 9d11a79

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback Medium
operator conditions network
This test has passed 93.47% of 1946 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.
---
[sig-sippy] tests should finish with healthy operators
This test has passed 90.85% of 1946 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-shard-1 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (105) are below the historical average (479): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-serial-shard-2 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (105) are below the historical average (392): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[bz-kube-storage-version-migrator] clusteroperator/kube-storage-version-migrator should not change condition/Available
This test has passed 64.88% of 2651 runs on release 4.20 [Overall] in the last week.

Open Bugs
etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time
---
[bz-Cloud Compute] clusteroperator/control-plane-machine-set should not change condition/Degraded
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:gcp SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.

Open Bugs
etcd-scaling jobs failing ~60% of the time
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (1338): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (1313): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (1377): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (713): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-serial IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (694): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6 IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (747): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (103) are below the historical average (1211): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling Low
[sig-api-machinery] disruption/cache-openshift-api apiserver/openshift-apiserver connection/new should be available throughout the test
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:vsphere SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
[sig-api-machinery] disruption/cache-kube-api apiserver/kube-apiserver connection/new should be available throughout the test
This test has passed 0.00% of 1 runs on release 4.20 [Architecture:amd64 FeatureSet:default Installer:ipi JobTier:rare Network:ovn NetworkStack:ipv4 Owner:eng Platform:vsphere SecurityMode:default Topology:ha Upgrade:none] in the last week.
---
Showing 2 of 6 test results

@alebedev87
Copy link
Contributor

/assign

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented May 14, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 7b39cea

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (93) are below the historical average (266): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (25) are below the historical average (1520): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling IncompleteTests
Tests for this run (99) are below the historical average (1473): IncompleteTests (not enough tests ran to make a reasonable risk analysis; this could be due to infra, installation, or upgrade problems)

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@melvinjoseph86 melvinjoseph86 force-pushed the gatewaycontroller_enh branch from 7b39cea to 94ac316 Compare May 15, 2025 05:40
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 15, 2025
@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-multi-a-a periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: trigger 5 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.19-e2e-aws-ovn
  • periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-multi-a-a
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.19-e2e-vsphere-ipi-ovn-runc

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/1522d3e0-3164-11f0-9b55-ca6bf5b76be5-0

@alebedev87
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 15, 2025
@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented May 15, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 94ac316

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-e2e-aws-disruptive Medium
[sig-node] static pods should start after being created
Potential external regression detected for High Risk Test analysis

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-aws-disruptive
/test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command

  • periodic-ci-openshift-multiarch-master-nightly-4.19-ocp-e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-multi-a-a

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/34c77f30-318b-11f0-96b4-f8cb3f302c1b-0

@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

melvinjoseph86 commented May 15, 2025

/assign @sosiouxme @deads2k
Kindly approve...

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: soltysh.

Note that only openshift members with read permissions, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

Details

In response to this:

/assign @sosiouxme @soltysh @deads2k
Kindly approve...

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-trt
Copy link

openshift-trt bot commented May 15, 2025

Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 94ac316

Job Name Failure Risk
pull-ci-openshift-origin-main-4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-rollback MissingData

@melvinjoseph86 melvinjoseph86 force-pushed the gatewaycontroller_enh branch from 94ac316 to 71388ce Compare May 16, 2025 08:34
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 16, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 16, 2025
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

PR needs rebase.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alebedev87, melvinjoseph86
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from deads2k. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@melvinjoseph86 melvinjoseph86 force-pushed the gatewaycontroller_enh branch from 71388ce to 067d8b1 Compare May 16, 2025 08:40
@melvinjoseph86
Copy link
Contributor Author

/close
for #29806

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this May 16, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close
for #29806

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 16, 2025

@melvinjoseph86: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-shard-2 9d11a79 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-shard-2
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-shard-1 9d11a79 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-shard-1
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw-techpreview 649bb49 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-local-gw-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview 649bb49 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-bgp-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack-local-gateway
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-ovn 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-openstack-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/lint 067d8b1 link true /test lint
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-edge-zones
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-fips-serial 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-gcp-fips-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/images 067d8b1 link true /test images
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
ci/prow/verify 067d8b1 link true /test verify
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
ci/prow/e2e-aws-proxy 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-proxy
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-2of2
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-serial 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-openstack-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-microshift 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-microshift
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-serial 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-serial-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-disruptive 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-gcp-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-hypershift-conformance 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-hypershift-conformance
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-serial
ci/prow/unit 067d8b1 link true /test unit
ci/prow/verify-deps 067d8b1 link true /test verify-deps
ci/prow/okd-scos-images 067d8b1 link true /test okd-scos-images
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2
ci/prow/e2e-azure 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-azure
ci/prow/e2e-aws 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial-publicnet
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-etcd-scaling
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/okd-e2e-gcp 067d8b1 link false /test okd-e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn 067d8b1 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-dualstack-primaryv6
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 067d8b1 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-kube-apiserver-rollout
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-csi 067d8b1 link false /test e2e-gcp-csi

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants