OCPBUGS-54568, OCPBUGS-54884: priority class: Add an exception for OSSM#29676
Closed
Miciah wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
Closed
OCPBUGS-54568, OCPBUGS-54884: priority class: Add an exception for OSSM#29676Miciah wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
Miciah wants to merge 4 commits intoopenshift:mainfrom
Conversation
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
Contributor
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
openshift-ci-robot
added
jira/severity-important
|
@Miciah: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54568, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Contributor
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Miciah The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
from
8d5b4c4 to
b6bfcab
Compare
openshift-merge-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
Contributor
Author
|
/test ? |
Contributor
|
@Miciah: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs: The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs: Use DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview |
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
from
b6bfcab to
5b8d81d
Compare
openshift-merge-robot
removed
the
needs-rebase
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview |
|
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New tests seen in this PR at sha: 5b8d81d
|
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
from
5b8d81d to
4309155
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-techpreview |
|
Job Failure Risk Analysis for sha: 4309155
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New Test Risks for sha: 4309155
New tests seen in this PR at sha: 4309155
|
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
from
4309155 to
cbe224f
Compare
Miciah
changed the title
|
@Miciah: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54568, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54884, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview |
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
from
b0f97e9 to
0d4e832
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview |
Co-Authored by melvinjoseph86 and lihongan
This commit is related to OCPBUGS-54568. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-54568 * test/extended/pods/priorityclasses.go (excludedPriorityClassPods): Add an override for the OSSM operator.
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-virt-techpreview |
Add a workaround for OSSM 3.0.0, which includes a version of Istio that creates a configmap in every namespace. This configmap throws off the accounting used in verifying the behavior of ClusterResourceQuota. This commit adds an adjustment to this accounting when the Istio configmap is found. This commit is related to OCPBUGS-54884. https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-54884 * test/extended/quota/clusterquota.go: Add workaround for Istio.
|
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New Test Risks for sha: 0d4e832
New tests seen in this PR at sha: 0d4e832
|
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
2 times, most recently
from
bf36075 to
2b807ae
Compare
Add an exception for Istio pods that specify resource limits. * test/extended/operators/resources.go: Add an exception for Istio pods.
Miciah
force-pushed
the
OCPBUGS-54568-priority-class-add-an-exception-for-OSSM
branch
from
2b807ae to
6d836e5
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview |
|
Risk analysis has seen new tests most likely introduced by this PR. New Test Risks for sha: 6d836e5
New tests seen in this PR at sha: 6d836e5
|
Contributor
Author
|
/test e2e-gcp-ovn-techpreview |
Contributor
|
@Miciah: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
Contributor
Author
|
/close CI finished running on this PR, and #29690 adds the resource-limits exception. |
Contributor
|
@Miciah: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@Miciah: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54568. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-54884. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add a priority-class override for the OSSM operator.