Skip to content

bug 2060406: bump apirequests upper bounds for GCP#27002

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
ingvagabund:bump-api-requests-bounds-gcp
Apr 13, 2022
Merged

bug 2060406: bump apirequests upper bounds for GCP#27002
openshift-merge-robot merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
ingvagabund:bump-api-requests-bounds-gcp

Conversation

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member

Based on percentile measurements the 50-percentile progresses around 112. 112/2 = 56.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2022

@ingvagabund: An error was encountered querying GitHub for users with public email (juzhao@redhat.com) for bug 2060406 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com. No known errors were detected, please see the full error message for details.

Full error message. non-200 OK status code: 403 Forbidden body: "{\n \"documentation_url\": \"https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#secondary-rate-limits\",\n \"message\": \"You have exceeded a secondary rate limit. Please wait a few minutes before you try again.\"\n}\n"

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

bug 2060406: bump apirequests upper bounds for GCP

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ironcladlou and knobunc April 11, 2022 16:00
Copy link
Contributor

@soltysh soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 11, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 11, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ingvagabund, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial failed only with [sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically which is not related to the bump.
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 12, 2022

@ingvagabund: ingvagabund unauthorized: /override is restricted to Repo administrators, approvers in top level OWNERS file.

Details

In response to this:

ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial failed only with [sig-arch] events should not repeat pathologically which is not related to the bump.
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-serial

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund
Copy link
Member Author

/retest-required

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

2 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 12, 2022

@ingvagabund: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade a4375e1 link false /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi a4375e1 link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node-upgrade a4375e1 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-single-node a4375e1 link false /test e2e-aws-single-node

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

7 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1991fd8 into openshift:master Apr 13, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 13, 2022

@ingvagabund: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2060406 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

bug 2060406: bump apirequests upper bounds for GCP

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@ingvagabund ingvagabund deleted the bump-api-requests-bounds-gcp branch April 13, 2022 07:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Comments