Skip to content

Conversation

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor

@rphillips rphillips commented Sep 25, 2019

Bump opencontainer/runc fork pin to pull in this commit to fix delegation not available errors.

Note This patch also pins openshift/{api,client-go,library-go,apiserver-library-go} to release branches.

The diff is large based on running make update-deps which is standard.

ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698543

/cc @mrunalp @sjenning

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1698543: bump libcontainer/runc and deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1698543: bump libcontainer/runc and deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 25, 2019
@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

Compile error.

vendor/github.com/openshift/api/authorization/v1/generated.pb.go:59:28: undefined: proto.InternalMessageInfo

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

working on a different fix with @mrunalp

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2019
@rphillips rphillips force-pushed the bump/libcontainer_4.2 branch from 797c846 to 048c028 Compare September 25, 2019 19:16
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 25, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.2.z" release, but it targets "4.2.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1698543: bump libcontainer/runc and deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2019
@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Sep 25, 2019

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 25, 2019

@rphillips: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-dr-quorum-tests 2ef1716 link /test e2e-dr-quorum-tests
ci/prow/e2e-dr-snapshot-tests 2ef1716 link /test e2e-dr-snapshot-tests

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is valid.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Sep 25, 2019
@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Sep 25, 2019

/lgtm

@mrunalp
Copy link
Member

mrunalp commented Sep 25, 2019

@smarterclayton ptal

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

bot got updated to target 4.2.0...

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is valid.

Details

In response to this:

bot got updated to target 4.2.0...

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is valid.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

# openshift second
- package: github.com/openshift/api
version: master
version: release-4.2
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This feels like something that should happen automatically when we fork an origin branch off master. Is there a plan to make that happen, or is it up to whoever makes the first post-fork vendor bump to do this?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I think this was missed upon branching.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Sep 25, 2019

Also, the Bugzilla bot is currently accepting rhbz#1698543 because there is no blocking 4.3.0 bug; otherwise it would need a VERIFIED 4.3.0 bug. Z patch managers could override that by setting labels manually, but we definitely don't want to fix this in 4.2 and then forget to fix it in 4.3.0. Maybe 88baf7f (#23811) obsoletes this bump in the master branch, but I think our current policy is to have blocking 4.3.0 bugs so QE can verify that we aren't leaking the fix.

@rphillips
Copy link
Contributor Author

@wking Got the 4.3 BZ and PR available.

@blomquisg
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 27, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@blomquisg: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1755991 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Sep 27, 2019
@blomquisg
Copy link

Had to reverse the BZ dependencies (4.3.0 should block 4.2.0). This PR will be blocked until the 4.3.0 BZ is verified

@nee1esh
Copy link

nee1esh commented Oct 1, 2019

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@nee1esh: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1698543, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1755991 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nee1esh
Copy link

nee1esh commented Oct 1, 2019

@eparis Can we get this approved for BZ process exception and cherry-picked for 4.2? 4.3 PR is merged. According to Seth "we don't have a recreate procedure for it and don't really know how it happens. we just removed the code that makes it possible."

@eparis eparis added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Oct 1, 2019
@eparis
Copy link
Member

eparis commented Oct 1, 2019

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: eparis, mrunalp, rphillips

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 1, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

4 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b6f8dda into openshift:release-4.2 Oct 1, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@rphillips: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1698543 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1698543: bump libcontainer/runc and deps

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants