Skip to content

Conversation

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

@deads2k deads2k commented May 15, 2015

As we discussed. If no template is provided in the config, ProjectRequest now operates against a default template that is not persisted. Setting the project request template field in the config overrides this default.

@liggitt

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused... this is submitting the template to the server to process? It doesn't actually persist anything, right? Does it matter what namespace we submit to as long as it exists?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm confused... this is submitting the template to the server to process? It doesn't actually persist anything, right? Does it matter what namespace we submit to as long as it exists?

Correct on all counts and we happen to have a namespace that always exists.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the namespace you submitted to showed up in the objects in the resulting list... guess not

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought the namespace you submitted to showed up in the objects in the resulting list... guess not

Nope. I think they really wanted to have both namespaced and non-namespaced templates, but couldn't actually do that.

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented May 15, 2015

LGTM

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor Author

deads2k commented May 15, 2015

[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/merge SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/merge_pull_requests_origin/1959/) (Image: devenv-fedora_1536)

@liggitt
Copy link
Contributor

liggitt commented May 15, 2015

hack/test-cmd.sh: line 84: openshift: command not found
!!! Error in hack/test-cmd.sh:84

re[merge]

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin up to e9f29e3

openshift-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 15, 2015
@openshift-bot openshift-bot merged commit b918cb0 into openshift:master May 15, 2015
@deads2k deads2k deleted the project-request-template branch May 16, 2015 16:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants