Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UPSTREAM: 3693: Cinder: Automatically Generate Zone if Availability in Storage Class is not Configured #4409

Conversation

pospispa
Copy link

Backport of Kubernetes PR kubernetes/website#3693.

Corresponding source code OpenShift origin PR openshift/origin#14159.

Documents the Cinder volume plugin behaviour in case the availability parameter in a Storage Class is not configured.

Improves description of aws-ebs and gce-pd volume plugins behavior in case zone parameter in a Storage Class is not configured.

Target OpenShift version: 3.6 and higher

@jsafrane @openshift/team-documentation PTAL

…n Storage Class is not Configured

Backport of Kubernetes PR openshift#3693 (kubernetes/website#3693).

Corresponding source code OpenShift origin PR openshift#14159 (openshift/origin#14159).

Documents the Cinder volume plugin behaviour in case the availability parameter in a Storage Class is not configured.

Improves description of aws-ebs and gce-pd volume plugins behavior in case zone parameter in a Storage Class is not configured.
@jsafrane
Copy link
Contributor

lgtm from tech side

@pospispa
Copy link
Author

@openshift/team-documentation corresponding source code is already a part of OpenShift origin, the tech review is finished so please, review and merge.

@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@pospispa Thanks! I will make some minor edits in a follow-up PR.

@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh merged commit d035c09 into openshift:master May 16, 2017
@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

No revision history needed

@vikram-redhat vikram-redhat modified the milestones: Future Release, Staging Jul 7, 2017
@vikram-redhat vikram-redhat modified the milestones: Future Release, Staging, OCP 3.6 GA Aug 8, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants