Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document PV & PVC pre-binding scenarios #3693

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 7, 2017

Conversation

ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor

@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh commented Feb 7, 2017

This continues the work in #3578

@ahardin-rh
Copy link
Contributor Author

[rev_history]
|xref:../dev_guide/persistent_volumes.adoc#dev-guide-persistent-volumes[Using Persistent Volumes]
|Added a new xref:../dev_guide/persistent_volumes.adoc#persistent-volumes-volumes-and-claim-prebinding[Volume and Claim Pre-binding] section
%

@vikram-redhat vikram-redhat modified the milestones: Next Release, Staging, Published - 02/17/2017 Feb 16, 2017
pospispa pushed a commit to pospispa/openshift-docs that referenced this pull request May 12, 2017
…n Storage Class is not Configured

Backport of Kubernetes PR openshift#3693 (kubernetes/website#3693).

Corresponding source code OpenShift origin PR openshift#14159 (openshift/origin#14159).

Documents the Cinder volume plugin behaviour in case the availability parameter in a Storage Class is not configured.

Improves description of aws-ebs and gce-pd volume plugins behavior in case zone parameter in a Storage Class is not configured.
@ahardin-rh ahardin-rh deleted the wongmaPR3578 branch November 9, 2017 19:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants