-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
OSDOCS-2144-Update 4.6+ sys reqs that BYO RHEL7 is deprecated #32074
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Deploy preview for osdocs ready! Built with commit 2d69cf0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As @katherinedube pointed out in #32070 (comment), we announced deprecation of this in 4.6, so this is updating the docs to reflect.
@katherinedube and @miabbott , @marrusl - please scrutinize line 28 ("In addition, you must not upgrade...") to be sure this makes sense here. Thanks!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm. Thanks!
|
BYO RHEL nodes don't really fall under the purview of RHCOS, but the wording looks sane to me. /lgtm |
codyhoag
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One minor question. Looks good otherwise!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see none of this module uses the RHEL attributes ({op-system-base-full} and {op-system-base}). Not sure if it's worth updating now or later, but thought I'd mention it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good point and worth the update. Resolved. Thanks, @codyhoag!
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.8 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.7 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.6 |
|
@bobfuru: #32074 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.7": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@bobfuru: new pull request created: #32242 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@bobfuru: #32074 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.6": DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
OSDOCS-2144
* Minor edits for style guide consistency (<- these do not need SME or QE review) (to mirror edits made in Update 4.8+ doc that OCP supports only RHEL 7.9 worker nodes #32070)PREVIEW LINK (System requirements for RHEL compute nodes):
https://deploy-preview-32074--osdocs.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/machine_management/user_infra/adding-rhel-compute.html#rhel-compute-requirements_adding-rhel-compute