Skip to content

Conversation

@bobfuru
Copy link
Contributor

@bobfuru bobfuru commented Apr 29, 2021

OSDOCS-2140
(Relates to 4.7 refs to RHEL 7.9 support: #31722)

Goals:

  • Communicate that OCP 4.8 GA is on RHEL 8.4 content (this should be addressed in a separate PR)
  • ~~Determine where to update language that RHEL 7 workers are deprecated
  • Minor edits for style guide consistency (<- these do not need SME or QE review)

Preview links:

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 29, 2021
@bobfuru bobfuru added this to the Future Release milestone Apr 29, 2021
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Apr 29, 2021

Deploy preview for osdocs ready!

Built with commit 25b6fe4

https://deploy-preview-32070--osdocs.netlify.app

@bobfuru bobfuru force-pushed the OSDOCS-2140 branch 3 times, most recently from 00fe4f0 to ad8e78f Compare April 29, 2021 20:39
@bobfuru
Copy link
Contributor Author

bobfuru commented Apr 29, 2021

Hi @marrusl, @katherinedube, @control-d and @miabbott PTAL at these updates for incorporating RHEL 8 support for compute machines. Thank you!

@bobfuru bobfuru force-pushed the OSDOCS-2140 branch 3 times, most recently from 3310499 to 6b8dccb Compare April 30, 2021 00:18
@bobfuru bobfuru changed the title Update 4.8+ doc that OCP supports only RHEL 7.9 and 8 worker nodes Update 4.8+ doc that OCP supports only RHEL 7.9 Apr 30, 2021
@bobfuru bobfuru changed the title Update 4.8+ doc that OCP supports only RHEL 7.9 Update 4.8+ doc that OCP supports only RHEL 7.9 worker nodes Apr 30, 2021
@miabbott
Copy link
Member

Looks sane to me

@bobfuru
Copy link
Contributor Author

bobfuru commented Apr 30, 2021

The scope of this PR has decreased since inception, with the bulk of the initially proposed work either unnecessary or forthcoming in subsequent PRs. Hence, the only items changing in this PR now are A) To fix RHEL supported version (now only 7.9), and B) Minor edits for docs style.

@bobfuru bobfuru added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 30, 2021
@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@bobfuru A couple of nits and a question born of my ignorance. Otherwise LGTM

@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 3, 2021
@bobfuru bobfuru merged commit eacdb13 into openshift:master May 3, 2021
@bobfuru bobfuru deleted the OSDOCS-2140 branch May 3, 2021 18:13
@bobfuru
Copy link
Contributor Author

bobfuru commented May 3, 2021

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@bobfuru: new pull request created: #32145

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.8

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.8 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants