Skip to content

Conversation

@dlbewley
Copy link
Contributor

@dlbewley dlbewley commented Aug 4, 2020

Suggested updates for openshift-sdn to ovn-kubernetes migration docs.

dlbewley and others added 3 commits August 3, 2020 15:16
Explicitely state success of no lingering openshift-sdn pods
Use watch command rather than the oc  --watch arg,
which offers no indication of completion
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Aug 4, 2020
@jboxman jboxman self-assigned this Aug 4, 2020
@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor

jboxman commented Aug 4, 2020

@dlbewley thanks, I'll take a look!

@dlbewley dlbewley changed the title openshift-sdn to ovn-kuberenetes migration testing feedback openshift-sdn to ovn-kubernetes migration testing feedback Aug 4, 2020
@dlbewley
Copy link
Contributor Author

dlbewley commented Aug 4, 2020

if i had a nickel for every time i've mistyped kubernetes..., i'd be less embarrased

+
----
$ oc get pod -n openshift-sdn --watch
$ watch oc get pod -n openshift-sdn
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dlbewley, what makes this preferable than --watch?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The condition the user wants to see is that all the pods are gone. Using --watch simply emits a stream of changes . It is much more obvious when the pods are gone with watch <cmd>, particularly if there are many pods (nodes).

If watch can be assumed to be broadly available I think the output is much more clear.

@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor

jboxman commented Aug 5, 2020

Hi @huiran0826,

Do these updates make sense?

Thanks!

@huiran0826
Copy link

lgtm

@jboxman jboxman added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Aug 6, 2020
@codyhoag codyhoag self-requested a review August 6, 2020 20:33
Copy link
Contributor

@codyhoag codyhoag left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Two small suggestions. Otherwise, LGTM!

----

. To confirm that the migration disabled the OVN-Kubernetes default CNI network provider, enter the following command. It might take several moments for all the OVN-Kubernetes Pods to stop.
. To confirm that the migration disabled the OVN-Kubernetes default CNI network provider and removed all the OVN-Kubernetes pods, enter the following command. It might take several moments for all the OVN-Kubernetes Pods to stop.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

s/pods/Pods

@codyhoag codyhoag added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Aug 6, 2020
@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor

jboxman commented Aug 6, 2020

@dlbewley, if you can fix the two issues above we're good to go with this.

Thanks!

@jboxman jboxman merged commit a5f777a into openshift:master Aug 17, 2020
@jboxman
Copy link
Contributor

jboxman commented Aug 17, 2020

@dlbewley, squashed and merged, thanks!

jboxman pushed a commit to jboxman-rh/openshift-docs that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2020
…#24445)

Update procedure for OVN-Kubernetes migration

Explicitly state success of no lingering openshift-sdn pods
Use watch command rather than the oc  --watch arg,
which offers no indication of completion

Co-authored-by: Vagner Farias <vfarias@redhat.com>
jboxman pushed a commit to jboxman-rh/openshift-docs that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2020
…#24445)

Update procedure for OVN-Kubernetes migration

Explicitly state success of no lingering openshift-sdn pods
Use watch command rather than the oc  --watch arg,
which offers no indication of completion

Co-authored-by: Vagner Farias <vfarias@redhat.com>
jboxman added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2020
…24832)

Update procedure for OVN-Kubernetes migration

Explicitly state success of no lingering openshift-sdn pods
Use watch command rather than the oc  --watch arg,
which offers no indication of completion

Co-authored-by: Dale Bewley <dale@bewley.net>
Co-authored-by: Vagner Farias <vfarias@redhat.com>
jboxman added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2020
[enterprise-4.6] openshift-sdn to ovn-kubernetes migration testing feedback (#24445)
@yuvalk yuvalk mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.5 branch/enterprise-4.6 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants