Skip to content

Conversation

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor

@maxwelldb maxwelldb commented Mar 11, 2020

For https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-923

  • Dev review
  • QE
  • Peer review

@maxwelldb maxwelldb added this to the Future Release milestone Mar 11, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb self-assigned this Mar 11, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 11, 2020
@openshift-docs-preview-bot

The preview will be available shortly at:

Copy link

@racedo racedo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link

@racedo racedo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With regards to preferred technology for the registry that's object storage. We should explain/remind users about this in this section, you can also point them to this explanation: https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.3/scalability_and_performance/optimizing-storage.html#registry

@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the shiftstack-swiftless-osdocs922 branch 2 times, most recently from 1b3d3d4 to 4b55031 Compare March 18, 2020 20:26
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Updating first two links.

As a quirk of Red Hat's modular documentation scheme, we're unable to link from one OCP docs page to another. I'll see if there's a way to include that information in a way that makes sense within this module.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the shiftstack-swiftless-osdocs922 branch from 2d80b76 to ea0a9b2 Compare March 18, 2020 21:19
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Any feedback on ea0a9b2, @racedo ?

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

maxwelldb commented Mar 27, 2020 via email

@mandre mandre mentioned this pull request Mar 27, 2020
10 tasks
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mandre Not sure when the preview will finish building, but you can see the latest changes as 76cf298 immediately, at least. Let me know what you think.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 30, 2020
@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from a user April 13, 2020 23:11
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Or @gpei and @morenod, if either of you have bandwidth for this PR, I'd much appreciate a 👍 / 👎

@morenod
Copy link

morenod commented Apr 14, 2020

/lgtml

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@morenod Thanks!

@maxwelldb maxwelldb removed the request for review from a user April 14, 2020 14:30
@maxwelldb maxwelldb added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label Apr 14, 2020
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mburke5678 Thanks! Thoughts on c62b793?

@mburke5678
Copy link
Contributor

@maxwelldb One last nit and LGTM

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mburke5678 Periods added.

@maxwelldb maxwelldb force-pushed the shiftstack-swiftless-osdocs922 branch from 567a7ed to f6906db Compare April 14, 2020 15:47
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

(And commits squashed.)

@maxwelldb maxwelldb requested a review from mburke5678 April 14, 2020 15:49
@mburke5678 mburke5678 added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels Apr 14, 2020
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@mburke5678 Thanks!

@maxwelldb maxwelldb merged commit 859c026 into openshift:master Apr 14, 2020
@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.4

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@maxwelldb: new pull request created: #21143

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick enterprise-4.4

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@maxwelldb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Not backported to 4.3 as per openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator#453 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

branch/enterprise-4.4 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants