Added 4.2 release notes #16410

ahardin-rh · 2019-08-27T19:33:19Z

Preview Build: http://file.rdu.redhat.com/~ahardin/09232019/OCP-4-2-release-notes/release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.html

bparees · 2019-09-08T18:07:57Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

4.2 introduces both disconnected installs and proxy supported installs

bparees · 2019-09-08T18:09:18Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

though this was tech preview in 4.2.. cc @knewcomerRH

Not even tech preview. Please remove any reference to FIPS mode. Thanks!

bparees · 2019-09-08T18:11:26Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

deprecated in 4.2? cc @jwforres (I don't know where this landed)

(same for the 2 brokers below)

huffmanca · 2019-09-09T20:47:22Z

Storage changes:

In the 4.1 release notes EFS was incorrectly marked as general availability. This is being included as a technology preview feature in 4.2.
In the 4.1 release notes volume Snapshots were incorrectly marked as being included as tech preview. They are not included in OCP 4.x.
Persistent volume snapshots are being deprecated in OCP 4.2.
Persistent volumes using the Local Storage Operator is being introduced in OCP 4.2.
CSI is moving to GA from Tech Preview.

knewcomerRH · 2019-09-09T21:09:29Z

FIPS mode is not supported in 4.2 and should be removed from the release notes. (While RHCOS can be configured in FIPS mode, OCP crashes when running on OCP in FIPS mode.) Kirsten Kirsten Newcomer OpenShift Product Management [email protected] +1 978-392-8114 (office) +1 781-710-2184 (mobile)

…

On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 4:47 PM Christian Huffman ***@***.***> wrote: Storage changes: - In 4.1 release notes EFS was incorrectly marked as general availability. This is being included as a technology preview feature in 4.2. - Persistent volume snapshots are being deprecated in OCP 4.2. - Persistent volumes using the Local Storage Operator is being introduced in OCP 4.2. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#16410?email_source=notifications&email_token=AGCUYWDCNS5VSAWHEQ3YOFTQI2Y53A5CNFSM4IQKRWSKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD6I7SAQ#issuecomment-529660162>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AGCUYWBMHHTSCVWPDZURAFLQI2Y53ANCNFSM4IQKRWSA> .

openshift-docs-preview-bot · 2019-09-20T21:09:23Z

The preview will be available shortly at:

welcome/index.adoc: https://OCP-4-2-release-notes--ocpdocs.netlify.com/openshift-enterprise/latest/welcome/index.html

vikram-redhat · 2019-09-24T10:03:18Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

{product-version} here and at other places.

bmcelvee · 2019-09-24T13:55:23Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

We need to add header formatting here - please and thank you!

ironcladlou · 2019-09-24T13:55:29Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

Is this supposed to be a header?

ironcladlou · 2019-09-24T14:04:31Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

Suggested replacement for this section:

When creating an IngressController on cloud platforms, the IngressController is
published by a public cloud load balancer by default.

Users can now publish IngressControllers with internal cloud load balancers. For example:

apiVersion: operator.openshift.io/v1 kind: IngressController metadata: namespace: openshift-ingress-operator name: internal spec: endpointPublishingStrategy: type: LoadBalancerService loadBalancer: scope: Internal

See the link:https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/services-networking/#internal-load-balancer.[Kubernetes Services documentation]
for implementation details.

Note that once set, .spec.endpointPublishingStrategy.loadBalancer.scope cannot
be changed. To change the scope, delete and recreate the IngressController.

The default IngressController can be made internal by deleting and recreating
it.

cc @openshift/sig-network-edge

Since this is release notes, I think we should move the details and example to product document (a new topic in https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/4.2/networking/ingress-operator.html), and here just provide the link to it like:
See xref:.. for more information.

So I've created #16963 for this content.

ashishkamra · 2019-09-24T20:00:01Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

@zvonkok can you review the above statements for GPU enablement?

ashishkamra · 2019-09-24T20:06:20Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

@zvonkok @ahardin-rh should SRO documentation be included in product docs? It is a community operator at this point, right?

@ashishkamra I will pull it out for now. Thanks!

ashishkamra · 2019-09-24T20:07:05Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

iSCSi -> iSCSI

ashishkamra · 2019-09-24T20:08:08Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

I guess the RHHI.next section may need to be removed after the recent announcements

bparees · 2019-09-24T20:47:49Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

@gabemontero do we have a note elsewhere about the restrictions on builds in disconnected envs? (sounds like the restriction is "they won't work" at this point since there is no way for the user to get the creds to be correct for the mirror)

nm, found the note/limitation at the bottom.

bparees · 2019-09-24T20:49:25Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

is moved to the dev perspective, right @spadgett? should probably say where it was moved to.

Yes, it's moved to the Developer perspective.

Developer -> Add+ -> From Catalog

shawn-hurley · 2019-09-30T15:51:07Z

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc

I think that we need to add
brokertemplateinstance.template.openshift.io

This is only added when template-service-broker is installed.
@bparees can you ack that this is correct and that we should add it here?

actually it looks like brokertemplateinstance is served out of the openshift apiserver, so i guess it'll still be present (but utterly useless w/ no TSB).

https://github.com/openshift/openshift-apiserver/tree/master/pkg/template/apiserver/registry/brokertemplateinstance

Should we remove this type in 4.4 as well?

ahardin-rh · 2019-10-01T17:47:00Z

I believe I addressed all feedback to date; I am merging this now and we can continue to iterate in separate PRs.

ahardin-rh · 2019-10-01T17:47:40Z

/cherrypick enterprise-4.2

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2019-10-01T17:47:48Z

@ahardin-rh: new pull request created: #16972

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.2

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

sunilcio · 2019-10-10T13:06:31Z

@ahardin-rh new edit suggestion in #17174

- openshift#16410 (comment)

ahardin-rh added the branch/enterprise-4.2 label Aug 27, 2019

ahardin-rh added this to the Future Release milestone Aug 27, 2019

ahardin-rh self-assigned this Aug 27, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 27, 2019

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from 74765d7 to 77c1d2b Compare August 30, 2019 21:55

openshift-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 30, 2019

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from 77c1d2b to 06cab55 Compare September 6, 2019 20:02

bparees reviewed Sep 8, 2019

View reviewed changes

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from 06cab55 to 8e2cd3e Compare September 16, 2019 19:07

adellape mentioned this pull request Sep 17, 2019

OpenShift 4.2 Release Notes Tracker #16327

Closed

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch 4 times, most recently from f46a8b5 to c22e4f2 Compare September 20, 2019 21:06

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from c22e4f2 to 3e50d93 Compare September 23, 2019 22:37

vikram-redhat reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

bmcelvee reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

ironcladlou reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc Outdated

Copy link

Contributor

ironcladlou Sep 24, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this supposed to be a header?

ahardin-rh reacted with thumbs up emoji

ironcladlou reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

ashishkamra reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc Outdated

Copy link

ashishkamra Sep 24, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zvonkok can you review the above statements for GPU enablement?

ashishkamra reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

release_notes/ocp-4-2-release-notes.adoc Outdated

Copy link

ashishkamra Sep 24, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

iSCSi -> iSCSI

ahardin-rh reacted with thumbs up emoji

ashishkamra reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

bparees reviewed Sep 24, 2019

View reviewed changes

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch 2 times, most recently from c3791ff to 72f5e5e Compare September 26, 2019 18:28

ahardin-rh changed the title ~~[WIP]Added 4.2 release notes~~ Added 4.2 release notes Sep 26, 2019

openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 26, 2019

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch 2 times, most recently from 84a9a84 to 4b529d5 Compare September 27, 2019 17:22

openshift-ci-robot added size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 27, 2019

adellape force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from c6dea59 to cf481b2 Compare September 27, 2019 19:19

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from 656efe1 to 9927ce2 Compare September 27, 2019 20:02

shawn-hurley reviewed Sep 30, 2019

View reviewed changes

jboxman mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2019

Describe configuring an internal load balancer for cloud #16963

Merged

Added 4.2 release notes

9daed32

ahardin-rh force-pushed the OCP-4-2-release-notes branch from 9927ce2 to 9daed32 Compare October 1, 2019 17:34

ahardin-rh merged commit b824d0c into openshift:master Oct 1, 2019

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Oct 1, 2019

[enterprise-4.2] Added 4.2 release notes #16972

Merged

vikram-redhat modified the milestones: Future Release, OCP 4.2 GA Oct 16, 2019

jboxman added a commit to jboxman-rh/openshift-docs that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2019

Describe configuring an internal load balancer for cloud

976c6f6

- openshift#16410 (comment)

openshift-cherrypick-robot pushed a commit to openshift-cherrypick-robot/openshift-docs that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2019

Describe configuring an internal load balancer for cloud

501651a

- openshift#16410 (comment)

openshift-cherrypick-robot pushed a commit to openshift-cherrypick-robot/openshift-docs that referenced this pull request Dec 19, 2019

Describe configuring an internal load balancer for cloud

b94335f

- openshift#16410 (comment)

codyhoag mentioned this pull request Jun 1, 2020

[enterprise-4.2] AWS EFS provisioner was dropped for 4.x #22524

Closed

Added 4.2 release notes #16410

Added 4.2 release notes #16410

Uh oh!

Conversation

ahardin-rh commented Aug 27, 2019 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

huffmanca commented Sep 9, 2019 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

knewcomerRH commented Sep 9, 2019 via email

Uh oh!

openshift-docs-preview-bot commented Sep 20, 2019

Uh oh!

vikram-redhat Sep 24, 2019 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ahardin-rh commented Oct 1, 2019

Uh oh!

ahardin-rh commented Oct 1, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Oct 1, 2019

Uh oh!

sunilcio commented Oct 10, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

20 participants

ahardin-rh commented Aug 27, 2019 •

edited

Loading

huffmanca commented Sep 9, 2019 •

edited

Loading

vikram-redhat Sep 24, 2019 •

edited

Loading