Skip to content

Bug 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver#163

Closed
p0lyn0mial wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:release-4.5from
p0lyn0mial:release-4.5-sar-tr-no-stack-on-panic
Closed

Bug 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver#163
p0lyn0mial wants to merge 2 commits intoopenshift:release-4.5from
p0lyn0mial:release-4.5-sar-tr-no-stack-on-panic

Conversation

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial commented Dec 8, 2020

No description provided.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 8, 2020

@p0lyn0mial: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

WIP: fake bump(*)

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 8, 2020
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Dec 8, 2020

requires openshift/kubernetes-apiserver#23

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Dec 8, 2020

/test e2e-cmd

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial force-pushed the release-4.5-sar-tr-no-stack-on-panic branch from 739392c to d7f2f65 Compare December 9, 2020 10:44
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title WIP: fake bump(*) Bug: 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in kube apiserver Dec 9, 2020
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Dec 9, 2020

/assign @sttts

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2020

@p0lyn0mial: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Bug: 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in kube apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 9, 2020
@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title Bug: 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in kube apiserver Bug: 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver Dec 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2020

@p0lyn0mial: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Bug: 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial changed the title Bug: 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver Bug 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver Dec 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 9, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2020

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894918, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894916 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ASSIGNED instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1885644 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894916 to target a release in 4.6.0, 4.6.z, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 9, 2020
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Dec 9, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2020

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894918, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894916 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@p0lyn0mial p0lyn0mial mentioned this pull request Dec 9, 2020
Merged
@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Dec 9, 2020

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 9, 2020

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894918, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1894916 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@sttts
Copy link
Contributor

sttts commented Dec 11, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2020

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: p0lyn0mial, sttts

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 11, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Dec 11, 2020

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

21 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 7, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Feb 8, 2021

/hold

#164 already contains the changes introduced in this PR.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 8, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Feb 8, 2021

@p0lyn0mial: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-cmd d7f2f65 link /test e2e-cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Feb 10, 2021

#164 already contains the changes introduced in this PR.

#164 has been cherry pick approved, can we close this?

@p0lyn0mial
Copy link
Contributor Author

p0lyn0mial commented Feb 11, 2021

#164 has been cherry pick approved, can we close this?

/close

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 11, 2021

@p0lyn0mial: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

#164 has been cherry pick approved, can we close this?

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 11, 2021

@p0lyn0mial: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1894918. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1894918: Panic output due to timeouts in openshift-apiserver

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@deads2k deads2k Awaiting requested review from deads2k

@mfojtik mfojtik Awaiting requested review from mfojtik

Assignees

@sttts sttts

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants

@p0lyn0mial @openshift-ci-robot @sttts @openshift-bot @knobunc @bparees

Comments