Skip to content

Conversation

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor

@djoshy djoshy commented Jul 29, 2024

- What I did
This PR currently vendors my API fork, which has the promoted feature gates. This will be updated to use the actual API repo prior to merge. This is currently done for testing purposes.

- How to verify it

API side PR: openshift/api#1975

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 29, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 29, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 29, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: djoshy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 29, 2024
@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Jul 29, 2024

/test unit
/test verify
/test e2e-gcp-op
/test e2e-gcp-op-techpreview

@djoshy djoshy changed the title [DNM] Testing FG promotion MCO-1065: MCO-1171: Promoting ManagedBootImages and NodeDisruptionPolicy to default featureset Jul 30, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 30, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 30, 2024

@djoshy: This pull request references MCO-1065 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@djoshy djoshy changed the title MCO-1065: MCO-1171: Promoting ManagedBootImages and NodeDisruptionPolicy to default featureset MCO-1065: MCO-1171: API bump for GAing ManagedBootImages and NodeDisruptionPolicy Jul 30, 2024
@djoshy djoshy changed the title MCO-1065: MCO-1171: API bump for GAing ManagedBootImages and NodeDisruptionPolicy MCO-1065: MCO-1171: API bump for ManagedBootImages and NodeDisruptionPolicy GA Jul 30, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 30, 2024

@djoshy: This pull request references MCO-1065 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did
This PR currently vendors my API fork, but will be updated to the actual API repo prior to merge. This is currently done for testing purposes.

- How to verify it

API side PR: openshift/api#1975

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 30, 2024

@djoshy: This pull request references MCO-1065 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did
This PR currently vendors my API fork, which has the promoted feature gates. This will be updated to use the actual API repo prior to merge. This is currently done for testing purposes.

- How to verify it

API side PR: openshift/api#1975

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@djoshy djoshy marked this pull request as ready for review July 30, 2024 14:48
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 30, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 30, 2024

@djoshy: This pull request references MCO-1065 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did
This PR currently vendors my API fork, which has the promoted feature gates. This will be updated to use the actual API repo prior to merge. This is currently done for testing purposes.

- How to verify it

API side PR: openshift/api#1975

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Jul 30, 2024

/test unit

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Jul 30, 2024

/test e2e-hypershift

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 30, 2024

@djoshy: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sergiordlr
Copy link
Contributor

sergiordlr commented Aug 1, 2024

It has been tested using IPI on GCP

We have executed the following test cases with and without techpreview:

"[sig-mco] MCO Bootimages Author:sregidor-NonHyperShiftHOST-NonPreRelease-Medium-74238-BootImages not updated by default [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO Bootimages Author:sregidor-NonHyperShiftHOST-NonPreRelease-Medium-74239-ManagedBootImages on GCP. Restore Partial MachineSet images [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO Bootimages Author:sregidor-NonHyperShiftHOST-NonPreRelease-Medium-74240-ManagedBootImages on GCP. Restore All MachineSet images [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO Bootimages Author:sregidor-NonHyperShiftHOST-NonPreRelease-Medium-74751-ManagedBootImages on GCP. Fix errors [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO Bootimages Author:sregidor-NonHyperShiftHOST-NonPreRelease-Medium-74764-ManagedBootImages on GCP. Delete machineset when error [Disruptive] [Serial]"


"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73368-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with action None [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73375-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with action Restart [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73378-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with action Reload [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73385-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with action DaemonReload [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73414-NodeDisruptionPolicy units with action None [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73417-NodeDisruptionPolicy sshkey with action None [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-High-73489-NodeDisruptionPolicy MachineConfigurations is only effective with name cluster"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73374-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with action Reboot [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73388-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with action Drain [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73389-NodeDisruptionPolicy files with multiple actions [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73411-NodeDisruptionPolicy units with multiple actions [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73413-NodeDisruptionPolicy units with action Reboot [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73415-NodeDisruptionPolicy sshkey with multiple actions [Disruptive] [Serial]"
"[sig-mco] MCO NodeDisruptionPolicy Author:rioliu-NonPreRelease-Longduration-High-73418-NodeDisruptionPolicy sshkey with action Reboot [Disruptive] [Serial]"
OCP-75110 - [MCO][MCO-1123] Propagate a NodeDisruptionPolicy failure condition via degrading the daemon
OCP-75109 - [MCO][MCO-1125] NodeDisruptionPolicy files allow paths to be defined for non-disruptive updates

We upgraded a cluster from 4.16 -> 4.17+fix. The upgrade was executed without problems.

    history:
    - acceptedRisks: |-
        Target release version="" image="registry.build05.ci.openshift.org/ci-ln-qy9q022/release:latest" cannot be verified, but continuing anyway because the update was forced: release images that are not accessed via digest cannot be verified
        Precondition "ClusterVersionRecommendedUpdate" failed because of "UnknownUpdate": RetrievedUpdates=False (VersionNotFound), so the recommended status of updating from 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-08-01-012721 to 4.17.0-0.ci.test-2024-07-30-153004-ci-ln-qy9q022-latest is unknown.
      completionTime: "2024-08-01T09:16:52Z"
      image: registry.build05.ci.openshift.org/ci-ln-qy9q022/release:latest
      startedTime: "2024-08-01T08:18:38Z"
      state: Completed
      verified: false
      version: 4.17.0-0.ci.test-2024-07-30-153004-ci-ln-qy9q022-latest
    - completionTime: "2024-08-01T06:43:35Z"
      image: registry.ci.openshift.org/ocp/release@sha256:fdc05e4b117f0503f7810af51971fdefc574d416f994953fecbab36b2db7706d
      startedTime: "2024-08-01T06:20:10Z"
      state: Completed
      verified: false
      version: 4.16.0-0.nightly-2024-08-01-012721

/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Aug 1, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Aug 1, 2024

@djoshy: This pull request references MCO-1065 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.17.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

- What I did
This PR currently vendors my API fork, which has the promoted feature gates. This will be updated to use the actual API repo prior to merge. This is currently done for testing purposes.

- How to verify it

API side PR: openshift/api#1975

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Aug 1, 2024

/hold
to prevent accidental merge

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 1, 2024
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

We'll follow up with a fix to the API pin to not break payloads

@djoshy
Copy link
Contributor Author

djoshy commented Aug 1, 2024

/shrug bot please

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 1, 2024
@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Aug 1, 2024

has to be merged with openshift/api#1975

@deads2k deads2k merged commit 76a8bb3 into openshift:master Aug 1, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-machine-config-operator
This PR has been included in build ose-machine-config-operator-container-v4.17.0-202408011849.p0.g76a8bb3.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

@djoshy djoshy deleted the fg-promo branch August 6, 2024 18:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants