Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4347

/assign hexfusion

Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <sbatsche@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 has been cloned as Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34965. Will retitle bug to link to clone.
/retitle [release-4.16] OCPBUGS-34965: daemon: upgrade os image from local container storage if it exists

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4347

/assign hexfusion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot changed the title [release-4.16] OCPBUGS-33248: daemon: upgrade os image from local container storage if it exists [release-4.16] OCPBUGS-34965: daemon: upgrade os image from local container storage if it exists Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34965, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 to target a version in 4.17.0, but it targets "4.16.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4347

/assign hexfusion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34965, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"
  • expected dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 to target a version in 4.17.0, but it targets "4.17" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from cheesesashimi and jkyros June 5, 2024 17:48
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34965, which is invalid:

  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required"

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 5, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34965, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

7 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.16.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.16.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)
  • release note text is set and does not match the template
  • dependent bug Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 is in the state MODIFIED, which is one of the valid states (MODIFIED, ON_QA, VERIFIED)
  • dependent Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 targets the "4.17.0" version, which is one of the valid target versions: 4.17.0
  • bug has dependents

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sergiordlr

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sergiordlr June 5, 2024 17:52
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@hexfusion
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

@sinnykumari
Copy link
Contributor

Clean backport
/lgtm
/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 6, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 6, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 6, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, sinnykumari

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 6, 2024
@sergiordlr
Copy link
Contributor

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jul 2, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 8c4afe0 and 2 for PR HEAD abfedcb in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 73d5f16 and 1 for PR HEAD abfedcb in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1ec936b and 0 for PR HEAD abfedcb in total

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

Revision abfedcb was retested 3 times: holding

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 9, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 9, 2024

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change abfedcb link false /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade abfedcb link unknown /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 8, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Nov 7, 2024
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Dec 8, 2024
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 8, 2024

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-34965. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. All external bug links have been closed. The bug has been moved to the NEW state.

Details

In response to this:

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4347

/assign hexfusion

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.