-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 462
OCPBUGS-33248: daemon: upgrade os image from local container storage if it exists #4347
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248, which is invalid:
Comment The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248, which is invalid:
Comment DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/jira refresh |
|
@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
514f87a to
0d21fd8
Compare
|
@hexfusion: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Verified in a disconnected cluster.
/label qe-approved |
|
/assign @sinnykumari |
sinnykumari
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
one minor nit in case we want to address before merge, otherwise lgtm.
Signed-off-by: Sam Batschelet <[email protected]>
|
/retest-required |
1 similar comment
|
/retest-required |
|
/lgtm |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hexfusion, sinnykumari The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/cherry-pick 4.16 |
|
@hexfusion: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of 4.16 in a new PR and assign it to you. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@hexfusion: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.16 in a new PR and assign it to you. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/retest-required |
|
@hexfusion: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/test e2e-gcp-op |
|
@hexfusion: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@hexfusion: cannot checkout DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-4.16 |
|
@hexfusion: new pull request created: #4392 DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] This PR has been included in build ose-machine-config-operator-container-v4.17.0-202406052200.p0.g743162d.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-machine-config-operator. |
|
Seeing if automation will kicks in for bug auto move |
|
@sinnykumari: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-33248 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
This PR add the ability to upgrade an os image if it has already been pulled into local container storage. This functionality is behind
PinnedImagefeature gate. The advantage to this path is that before this change skopeo by default will make a call to the registry to pull the image during upgrade. That does not work for disconnected clusters.