Skip to content

Conversation

@jlebon
Copy link
Member

@jlebon jlebon commented Feb 14, 2019

Minor regression from #404. For the substitution to take place, the
pullspec has to match exactly.


I'm still confirming it, but I think this is the root of my issues in #363 (comment). The masters are getting their osImageURL from the bootstrap path (which gets it from the image-references file in the payload), while the controller gets it from the configmap, so the mismatch was causing a checksum diff.

I think the e2e-aws tests didn't fail on this because it follows a slightly different path? openshift/origin#21919

Minor regression from openshift#404. For the substitution to take place, the
pullspec has to match exactly.
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jlebon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@jlebon
Copy link
Member Author

jlebon commented Feb 14, 2019

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. labels Feb 14, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 14, 2019
@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

#363 has d58765b

Are you sure you were testing with that commit included?

@jlebon
Copy link
Member Author

jlebon commented Feb 14, 2019

Are you sure you were testing with that commit included?

Oh wow, completely missed that. I had only cherry-picked the HEAD. 😇
OK, so sanity confirmed.

Thoughts on the added text here?

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

I think my vote is after we branch, make it a completely dummy value not resembling the real ones. But at this point I'd probably stick with trying to get #363 in as is? Just since it's a known quantity.

@jlebon jlebon closed this Feb 14, 2019
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@jlebon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun them all:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-op 4248c32 link /test e2e-aws-op
ci/prow/e2e-aws 4248c32 link /test e2e-aws

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants