Skip to content

Comments

Bug 2041971: Revert use webhookApply implementation from Library Go#980

Closed
JoelSpeed wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
JoelSpeed:revert-webhook-apply
Closed

Bug 2041971: Revert use webhookApply implementation from Library Go#980
JoelSpeed wants to merge 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
JoelSpeed:revert-webhook-apply

Conversation

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor

The library go implementation of webhook apply has been broken, it no longer updates the spec unless metadata is changed and as such, is not useful to us.

We had a working implementation before we switched to library go, so my plan is to revert the migration to library go until the implementation is fixed within library go

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 20, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2022

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2041971, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @sunzhaohua2

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2041971: Revert use webhookApply implementation from Library Go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jan 20, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from sunzhaohua2 January 20, 2022 09:55
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please ask for approval from joelspeed after the PR has been reviewed.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test unit

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest-required
/skip

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 20, 2022

@JoelSpeed: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-operator 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-vsphere-operator
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-vsphere
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-upgrade 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-vsphere-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 864e9b8 link false /test e2e-openstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

We may be able to fix this using openshift/library-go#1293 instead

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 20, 2022
@JoelSpeed
Copy link
Contributor Author

/close
#981 is a better solution to this bug

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Jan 24, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2022

@JoelSpeed: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/close
#981 is a better solution to this bug

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 24, 2022

@JoelSpeed: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2041971. The bug has been updated to no longer refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2041971: Revert use webhookApply implementation from Library Go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant