-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
[WIP] Equinix Metal Support #753
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Hi @detiber. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
go.mod
Outdated
|
|
||
| replace sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-azure => github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-azure v0.1.0-alpha.3.0.20201016155852-4090a6970205 | ||
|
|
||
| replace github.com/openshift/api => github.com/detiber/api v0.0.0-20201113192824-c19de3594400 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Relies on changes in openshift/api#784
elmiko
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks reasonable to me. i have not had a chance to run it yet, although the binary build and unit tests worked. i had a minor suggestion about the CCO repo, but it's not a blocker.
i think we should put a hold here just to make sure we don't do anything before the api changes merge.
/lgtm
/hold until openshift/api#784 has merged
|
one more comment, this should be rebased as some of the baremetal stuff has been removed since it was first posted. |
|
@detiber: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
go.mod
Outdated
|
|
||
| replace sigs.k8s.io/cluster-api-provider-azure => github.com/openshift/cluster-api-provider-azure v0.1.0-alpha.3.0.20201130182513-88b90230f2a4 | ||
|
|
||
| replace github.com/openshift/api => github.com/detiber/api v0.0.0-20210113181726-19e9a251beff |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Temporary workaround until openshift/api#784 is merged
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, that makes sense for now
|
Rebased, I'm having difficulty running the tests locally, they don't like running outside of docker (running hack/ci-test.sh directly due to not having the kubebuilder binaries installed where it wants them) and running in docker doesn't seem happy. Not sure how to reconcile at the moment, but may try digging in further a little be latter on down the line. |
yeah, i apologize for this but it's a known deficiency currently. i will spend some time to see if i can provide a good recipe for running these.
i am going to take another look as well to see if we can't make this easier for you. this is a known issue |
|
Updated, did some squashing, added the commit from #789 to enable local testing |
|
those changes worked for me, i was able to build the binary with |
|
just wanted to leave an update here, i am still working towards live testing of the equinix metal provider. i have access to the equinix platform and have been working through the upi installation process for openshift. my next step will be to add in the equinix specific provider bits and run some manual testing followed by attempting to run our e2e tests. |
|
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle stale |
|
@detiber: PR needs rebase. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity. Mark the issue as fresh by commenting If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /lifecycle rotten |
|
Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity. Reopen the issue by commenting /close |
|
@openshift-bot: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
/reopen |
|
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
|
@displague: You can't reopen an issue/PR unless you authored it or you are a collaborator. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Depends on:
openshift/cloud-credential-operator#283
openshift/api#784