[sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6] Bug 1928773: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service #581

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-02-19T19:04:44Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #574

/assign Miciah

Kube-proxy now prefers the node-local DNS pod, if one exists, for the cluster DNS service.

This commit fixes bug 1919737. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919737 * pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier.go (syncProxyRules): Prefer a local endpoint for the cluster DNS service.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-19T19:04:48Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Could not make automatic cherrypick of Bugzilla bug 1919737 for this PR as the target_release is not set for this branch in the bugzilla plugin config. Running refresh:
/bugzilla refresh

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-19T19:04:52Z

@openshift-ci-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1919737, which is invalid:

expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead
expected Bugzilla bug 1919737 to depend on a bug in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-19T19:04:52Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

3a52825|UPSTREAM: : Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service: does not specify an upstream backport in the commit message

Miciah · 2021-02-23T14:13:51Z

openshift/sdn#261 passed CI with this carry vendored. Next step is to merge this PR, and then update openshift/sdn#261 to do a proper vendor bump.

Miciah · 2021-02-23T14:17:27Z

/retitle [sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6] Bug 1928773: UPSTREAM: : Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-23T14:17:45Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

knobunc · 2021-02-24T18:52:32Z

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-24T20:45:26Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: knobunc, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2021-02-25T01:00:19Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-25T01:00:27Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-26T01:00:31Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-26T01:00:37Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-27T01:00:42Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-27T01:00:49Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-28T01:00:53Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-28T01:00:57Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-03-01T01:00:43Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-03-01T01:00:47Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-03-02T01:00:39Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-03-02T01:00:43Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1928773, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1928304 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-03-02T15:11:17Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

openshift/cluster-dns-operator#236 is open

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 1928773 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Miciah · 2021-03-04T15:10:37Z

/cherry-pick sdn-4.5-kubernetes-1.18.2

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-03-04T15:14:19Z

@Miciah: new pull request created: #604

Details

In response to this:

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service

3a52825

This commit fixes bug 1919737. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1919737 * pkg/proxy/iptables/proxier.go (syncProxyRules): Prefer a local endpoint for the cluster DNS service.

openshift-ci-robot assigned Miciah Feb 19, 2021

openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Feb 19, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2021

Bug 1919737: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service #574

Merged

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-urgent Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is urgent for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 19, 2021

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6] Bug 1919737: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service~~ [sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6] Bug 1928773: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service Feb 23, 2021

openshift-ci-robot assigned knobunc Feb 24, 2021

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 24, 2021

deads2k added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 24, 2021

danwinship merged commit 05e619e into openshift:sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6 Mar 2, 2021

Miciah mentioned this pull request Mar 2, 2021

[release-4.6] Bug 1928773: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service openshift/sdn#261

Merged

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Mar 4, 2021

[sdn-4.5-kubernetes-1.18.2] Bug 1935297: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service #604

Merged

[sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6] Bug 1928773: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service #581

[sdn-4.6-kubernetes-1.18.6] Bug 1928773: UPSTREAM: <carry>: Prefer local endpoint for cluster DNS service #581

Uh oh!

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Feb 19, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 19, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 19, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 19, 2021

Uh oh!

Miciah commented Feb 23, 2021

Uh oh!

Miciah commented Feb 23, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 23, 2021

Uh oh!

knobunc commented Feb 24, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 24, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 25, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 25, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 26, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 26, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 27, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 27, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 28, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 28, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 1, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Mar 2, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 2, 2021

Uh oh!

Miciah commented Mar 4, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Mar 4, 2021

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

7 participants