[release-4.7] Bug 1925941: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e by openshift-cherrypick-robot · Pull Request #554 · openshift/kubernetes

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2021-02-07T15:04:48Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #547

/assign damemi

This adds a call to createBalancedPods during the ubernetes_lite scheduling e2es, which are prone to improper score balancing due to unbalanced utilization.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-07T15:04:56Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: the contents of this pull request could be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

0e8d123|UPSTREAM: 98699: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e: the upstream PR kubernetes/kubernetes#98699 has merged

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-07T15:04:57Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1896558 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1925941. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.7] Bug 1925941: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1896558: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-07T15:05:12Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to target a release in 4.8.0, but it targets "4.7.0" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1925941: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

damemi

/lgtm
/retest
/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-08T15:06:17Z

@damemi: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.7.0" release, but it targets "4.8.0" instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm
/retest
/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

damemi · 2021-02-08T15:06:50Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-08T15:06:53Z

@damemi: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

soltysh

/approve

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-08T15:38:00Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, openshift-cherrypick-robot, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS~~ [soltysh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-bot · 2021-02-08T15:47:41Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-08T16:52:41Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-08T17:11:25Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-08T17:44:42Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-08T18:10:42Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-08T18:49:41Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-09T00:01:45Z

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-17T18:50:48Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-18T01:00:28Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-18T01:00:35Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-19T01:00:38Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-19T01:00:42Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-20T01:01:04Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-20T01:01:07Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-21T01:00:36Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-21T01:00:39Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-bot · 2021-02-22T01:00:35Z

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2021-02-22T01:00:38Z

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: MODIFIED, VERIFIED, but it is ASSIGNED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

damemi · 2021-02-22T13:46:36Z

/hold
to stop bot spam while dependent BZs get sorted out

openshift-bot · 2021-05-25T07:35:59Z

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle stale

openshift-bot · 2021-06-24T11:15:41Z

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.

Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.
Exclude this issue from closing by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

/lifecycle rotten
/remove-lifecycle stale

openshift-bot · 2021-07-24T14:05:20Z

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

openshift-ci · 2021-07-24T14:05:28Z

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

damemi · 2021-07-30T17:44:22Z

/reopen

openshift-ci · 2021-07-30T17:44:30Z

@damemi: Reopened this PR.

Details

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-07-30T17:44:32Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1925941, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ASSIGNED instead
expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1896558 to target a release in 4.8.0, 4.8.z, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.7] Bug 1925941: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci · 2021-07-30T17:46:01Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: damemi, openshift-cherrypick-robot, soltysh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~DOWNSTREAM_OWNERS~~ [soltysh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

openshift-ci · 2021-07-30T19:46:11Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere	`0e8d123`	link	`/test e2e-vsphere`
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi	`0e8d123`	link	`/test e2e-metal-ipi`
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack	`0e8d123`	link	`/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack`
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-cmd	`0e8d123`	link	`/test e2e-agnostic-cmd`
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn	`0e8d123`	link	`/test e2e-aws-ovn`
ci/prow/e2e-azure	`0e8d123`	link	`/test e2e-azure`

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

openshift-bot · 2021-08-29T20:52:51Z

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

openshift-ci · 2021-08-29T20:54:12Z

@openshift-bot: Closed this PR.

Details

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.

Reopen the issue by commenting /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh by commenting /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Exclude this issue from closing again by commenting /lifecycle frozen.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

UPSTREAM: 98699: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e

0e8d123

This adds a call to createBalancedPods during the ubernetes_lite scheduling e2es, which are prone to improper score balancing due to unbalanced utilization.

openshift-ci-robot assigned damemi Feb 7, 2021

openshift-ci-robot added the backports/validated-commits Indicates that all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Feb 7, 2021

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Feb 7, 2021

Bug 1896558: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e #547

Merged

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.7] Bug 1896558: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e~~ [release-4.7] Bug 1925941: Balance nodes in scheduling e2e Feb 7, 2021

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 7, 2021

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 7, 2021

openshift-ci-robot requested review from mfojtik and sttts February 7, 2021 15:06

damemi reviewed Feb 8, 2021

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 8, 2021

This was referenced Feb 8, 2021

Bug 1896558: bump(openshift/kubernetes): fix flaking multi-AZ test openshift/origin#25848

Merged

[release-4.7] Bug 1925941: (bump) balance nodes in scheduler e2e openshift/origin#25868

Closed

soltysh approved these changes Feb 8, 2021

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 8, 2021

mfojtik added the staff-eng-approved Indicates a release branch PR has been approved by a staff engineer (formerly group/pillar lead). label Feb 8, 2021

openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Feb 22, 2021

openshift-ci bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 25, 2021

openshift-ci bot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 24, 2021

openshift-ci bot closed this Jul 24, 2021

openshift-ci bot reopened this Jul 30, 2021

openshift-ci bot closed this Aug 29, 2021

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Feb 7, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 7, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 7, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 7, 2021

Uh oh!

damemi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

damemi commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

soltysh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 8, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 9, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 17, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 18, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 18, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 19, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 19, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 20, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 20, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 21, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 21, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Feb 22, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Feb 22, 2021

Uh oh!

damemi commented Feb 22, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented May 25, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jun 24, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Jul 24, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 24, 2021

Uh oh!

damemi commented Jul 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 30, 2021

Uh oh!

openshift-bot commented Aug 29, 2021