Skip to content

Conversation

@celebdor
Copy link
Contributor

When the release image is already present, the script should not try pulling. This slows down bootstrapping as well as breaking image pre-caching.

Signed-off-by: Antoni Segura Puimedon [email protected]

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from r4f4 and rna-afk October 31, 2022 08:59
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Oct 31, 2022

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@sadasu
Copy link
Contributor

sadasu commented Nov 1, 2022

/retest-required

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We probably want to still record_service_stage_success even if we don't need to pull an image.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What about using podman image exists "$RELEASE_IMAGE"?

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Nov 3, 2022

Maybe we should create a bug for this so it can be backported to previous release branches?

@celebdor celebdor changed the title bootstrap: Do not needlessly podman pull OCPBUGS-2968: bootstrap: Do not needlessly podman pull Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@celebdor: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2968, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.13.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

When the release image is already present, the script should not try pulling. This slows down bootstrapping as well as breaking image pre-caching.

Signed-off-by: Antoni Segura Puimedon [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 11, 2022
@celebdor
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 11, 2022
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@celebdor: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2968, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.13.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.13.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @zniu1011

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from zniu1011 November 11, 2022 16:13
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Nov 23, 2022

@celebdor Are you still working on this PR? There are some reviewer comments to be addressed.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: could be extracted before the if to remove the duplication

@andfasano
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 2, 2022
@andfasano
Copy link
Contributor

/test ci/prow/e2e-agent-sno-ipv6

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 2, 2022

@andfasano: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test aro-unit
  • /test e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
  • /test e2e-vsphere-upi
  • /test gofmt
  • /test golint
  • /test govet
  • /test images
  • /test okd-images
  • /test okd-scos-images
  • /test okd-unit
  • /test okd-verify-codegen
  • /test openstack-manifests
  • /test shellcheck
  • /test tf-lint
  • /test unit
  • /test verify-codegen
  • /test verify-vendor
  • /test yaml-lint

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test e2e-agent-ha-dualstack
  • /test e2e-agent-mce
  • /test e2e-agent-sno-ipv6
  • /test e2e-alibaba
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-imdsv2
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-proxy
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
  • /test e2e-aws-upi-proxy
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-resourcegroup
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-azurestack
  • /test e2e-azurestack-upi
  • /test e2e-crc
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-shared-vpc
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-upi-xpn
  • /test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
  • /test e2e-libvirt
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-swapped-hosts
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-virtualmedia
  • /test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
  • /test e2e-openstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-kuryr
  • /test e2e-openstack-proxy
  • /test e2e-openstack-sdn-parallel
  • /test e2e-openstack-upi
  • /test e2e-ovirt-sdn
  • /test e2e-sdn-nutanix
  • /test e2e-vsphere-zones
  • /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-vsphere
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • /test okd-scos-e2e-vsphere
  • /test okd-scos-unit
  • /test okd-scos-verify-codegen
  • /test tf-fmt

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-aro-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-agent-compact-ipv4
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-agent-ha-dualstack
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-agent-sno-ipv6
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-azure-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-gcp-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-libvirt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-metal-assisted
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-openstack
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-ovirt-sdn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-e2e-vsphere-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-gofmt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-golint
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-govet
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-scos-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-okd-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-shellcheck
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-tf-fmt
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-tf-lint
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-verify-codegen
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-verify-vendor
  • pull-ci-openshift-installer-master-yaml-lint
Details

In response to this:

/test ci/prow/e2e-agent-sno-ipv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2022
@andfasano
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 16, 2022
@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Dec 16, 2022

/override ci/prow/golint
Linter issues are being fixed in #6712 and this PR doesn't touch any Go files.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 16, 2022

@r4f4: Overrode contexts on behalf of r4f4: ci/prow/golint

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/golint
Linter issues are being fixed in #6712 and this PR doesn't touch any Go files.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

When the release image is already present, the script should not try
pulling. This slows down bootstrapping as well as breaking image
pre-caching.

Signed-off-by: Antoni Segura Puimedon <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 19, 2022
@zaneb
Copy link
Member

zaneb commented Dec 19, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 12, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Feb 7, 2023
@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 13, 2023
@zaneb
Copy link
Member

zaneb commented Mar 6, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 6, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@zaneb: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2968, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.14.0" version, but it targets "4.13.0" instead

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor

bfournie commented Mar 8, 2023

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 8, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2968, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.14.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.14.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @bmanzari

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from bmanzari March 8, 2023 21:17
@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor

bfournie commented Mar 8, 2023

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 9, 2023

@celebdor: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade b73eddeb8aa6863c11716fba4554d3671db7446c link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-agent-mce b73eddeb8aa6863c11716fba4554d3671db7446c link false /test e2e-agent-mce
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn 9d5e877 link true /test e2e-vsphere-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 9d5e877 link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-sdn 9d5e877 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-sdn
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 9d5e877 link false /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-ovirt-sdn 9d5e877 link false /test e2e-ovirt-sdn
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn 9d5e877 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn 9d5e877 link true /test e2e-azure-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud-ovn 9d5e877 link false /test e2e-ibmcloud-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted 9d5e877 link false /test e2e-metal-assisted
ci/prow/agent-integration-tests 9d5e877 link true /test agent-integration-tests
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-upi-zones 155f9d2 link false /test e2e-vsphere-upi-zones
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-secureboot 155f9d2 link false /test e2e-gcp-secureboot
ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade 155f9d2 link false /test okd-scos-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-ovn 155f9d2 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 155f9d2 link false /test okd-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive 155f9d2 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-disruptive

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@r4f4
Copy link
Contributor

r4f4 commented Mar 15, 2023

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: r4f4

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 15, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 4c5fce9 and 2 for PR HEAD 155f9d2 in total

@zaneb
Copy link
Member

zaneb commented Mar 15, 2023

/retest-required

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 7cdbc1c into openshift:master Mar 15, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@celebdor: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2968: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-2968 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

When the release image is already present, the script should not try pulling. This slows down bootstrapping as well as breaking image pre-caching.

Signed-off-by: Antoni Segura Puimedon [email protected]

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants