Skip to content

Add IBM Power VS: tfvars#5615

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
clnperez:new-tfvars-pkg
Apr 11, 2022
Merged

Add IBM Power VS: tfvars#5615
openshift-merge-robot merged 2 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
clnperez:new-tfvars-pkg

Conversation

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@clnperez clnperez commented Feb 4, 2022

For more background on IPI on Power VS, refer to the enhancement
proposal here: openshift/enhancements#736

Older discussions on some of the code here can be found in #5224

Signed-off-by: Christy Norman christy@linux.vnet.ibm.com

Comment thread pkg/tfvars/powervs/powervs.go Outdated
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

working on cleaning this up now that the others are in. got sidetracked

@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-tfvars-pkg branch 4 times, most recently from 84aafef to eebc7e5 Compare March 22, 2022 22:25
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@rna-afk @patrickdillon can you take a look at this one?

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Mar 23, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 23, 2022
Comment thread pkg/asset/cluster/tfvars.go Outdated
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

tests seem stuck since yesterday
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Mar 24, 2022
@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-tfvars-pkg branch 2 times, most recently from dc5d6f2 to c3d9b1e Compare March 24, 2022 18:50
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 24, 2022
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

i fixed the tf formatting. can you re-lgtm this @rna-afk ?

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Mar 24, 2022

Could you move the rhcos changes to the first commit? I think just two commits are fine with one for vendoring and other for the code.

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

done @rna-afk

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

blergh. i'm out until tuesday (starting tomorrow) @patrickdillon could you approve this one?

and @Prashanth684 would you mind babysitting (/retest-required) if those keep failing?

@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retest-required

@clnperez clnperez force-pushed the new-tfvars-pkg branch 2 times, most recently from a901ad7 to a6e8bab Compare April 6, 2022 15:14
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Apr 6, 2022
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Apr 6, 2022

just picked up the new nutanix provider. should be good again.

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Apr 6, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2022
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Apr 6, 2022

aaaaand there's a new conflict. this will be fun :D

clnperez added 2 commits April 6, 2022 15:19
For more background on IPI on Power VS, refer to the enhancement
proposal here: openshift/enhancements#736

Older discussions on some of the code here can be found in openshift#5224

Signed-off-by: Christy Norman <christy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
specifically, we need to pick up this commit: coreos/stream-metadata-go@89bd6bc

Signed-off-by: Christy Norman <christy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2022
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Apr 6, 2022

@rna-afk i think that's resolved now as well so will need that lgtm again

@rna-afk
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

rna-afk commented Apr 6, 2022

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2022
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Apr 7, 2022

/retest-required

1 similar comment
@clnperez
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

clnperez commented Apr 7, 2022

/retest-required

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 11, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 11, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

3 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Apr 11, 2022

@clnperez: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-azure-upi 0e560460ac80e649a40d13805f0733f0c9d028b0 link false /test e2e-azure-upi
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws-upgrade 57245ea406350872b5e451e2e3e4644b0abe238a link false /test okd-e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-upgrade 57245ea406350872b5e451e2e3e4644b0abe238a link true /test e2e-aws-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upgrade 57245ea406350872b5e451e2e3e4644b0abe238a link true /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-metal-single-node-live-iso
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-gcp
ci/prow/e2e-azure-shared-vpc 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-azure-shared-vpc
ci/prow/okd-e2e-aws 9a3bfb2 link false /test okd-e2e-aws
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-proxy 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-openstack-proxy
ci/prow/e2e-ibmcloud 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-ibmcloud
ci/prow/e2e-openstack-parallel 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-openstack-parallel
ci/prow/e2e-crc 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-crc
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-libvirt
ci/prow/e2e-openstack 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-azurestack 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-azurestack
ci/prow/e2e-alibaba 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-alibaba
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-upi-xpn 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-gcp-upi-xpn
ci/prow/e2e-azure-resourcegroup 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-azure-resourcegroup
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-shared-vpc 9a3bfb2 link false /test e2e-gcp-shared-vpc

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/skip
/refresh

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a8a0f7a into openshift:master Apr 11, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants