-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Bug 2037209: vendor: update openshift/api to latest in preparation for alibaba machine provider changes #5563
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bug 2037209: vendor: update openshift/api to latest in preparation for alibaba machine provider changes #5563
Conversation
staebler
commented
Jan 21, 2022
- Update openshift/api to 0a830aea20c2.
- Update kube modules to v0.23.0.
- Update controller-runtime to v0.11.0.
- Remove unused terraform-provider-kubernetes.
- Updated the hack/verify-codegen.sh script to use an image containing go 1.17, rather than go 1.16.
* Update openshift/api to 6e0b1eb97188. * Update kube modules to v0.23.0. * Update controller-runtime to v0.11.0. * Remove unused terraform-provider-kubernetes.
The hack/verify-codegen.sh script was using an image that included go 1.16. However, the updated k8s.io/json module calls the `(reflect.StructField) IsExported` function, which is new in go 1.17. Consequently, the script needs to be updated to use an image that include go 1.17 rather than 1.16.
|
@staebler: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2037209, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
This is to prepare for the bump of openshift/api in #5562. |
|
@staebler: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@staebler @patrickdillon @elmiko /lgtm |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: patrickdillon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/test e2e-aws-upgrade |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
4 similar comments
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
/retest-required Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes. |
|
@staebler: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged: These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with Bugzilla bug 2037209 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |