Skip to content

Conversation

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member

This is what I do. dnf no longer complains if invoked as yum;
there's no point to having two separate sets of instructions.

This is what I do.  `dnf` no longer complains if invoked as `yum`;
there's no point to having two separate sets of instructions.

Also use `systemctl enable --now` for further brevity.
@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Oct 22, 2018

Will RHEL and other hold-outs eventually drop yum in favor of dnf?

@cgwalters
Copy link
Member Author

Will RHEL and other hold-outs eventually drop yum in favor of dnf?

I can't speak for "eventually" here but...I just don't think it's worth us maintaining two instructions today. The "CentOS" instructions work on Fedora and I think that's very unlikely to change.

@wking
Copy link
Member

wking commented Oct 22, 2018

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 22, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cgwalters, wking

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 22, 2018
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 22, 2018
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit e1a71ff into openshift:master Oct 22, 2018
flaper87 added a commit to flaper87/installer that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2018
As the work progresses and the familiarity with the code base grows, it
would be ideal for the OpenStack team to join the reviewers team and
help with specific and more focused reviews.

Specifically, the team is interested in reviewing OpenStack related
patches (like openshift#511) in order to ease the workload from the rest of the
team.

The OpenStack team won't be reviewing patches outside their area of
competence.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants