Skip to content

Conversation

@russellb
Copy link
Contributor

This was previously done with an option to dhclient, but this doesn't
work when doing DHCPv6. Switch to a script run by NetworkManager to do
the same thing.

This matches the same approach moved to by the MCO in this PR:

openshift/machine-config-operator#1396

This was previously done with an option to dhclient, but this doesn't
work when doing DHCPv6.  Switch to a script run by NetworkManager to do
the same thing.

This matches the same approach moved to by the MCO in this PR:

openshift/machine-config-operator#1396
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 24, 2020
@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cc @hardys
/cc @celebdor
/cc @stbenjam

russellb referenced this pull request in openshift-kni/installer Jan 24, 2020
This was previously done with an option to dhclient, but this doesn't
work when doing DHCPv6.  Switch to a script run by NetworkManager to do
the same thing.

This matches the same approach moved to by the MCO in this PR:

openshift/machine-config-operator#1396
@stbenjam
Copy link
Member

/label platform/baremetal

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the platform/baremetal IPI bare metal hosts platform label Jan 24, 2020
@metal3ci
Copy link

Build FAILURE, see build http://10.8.144.11:8080/job/dev-tools/1458/

@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Jan 27, 2020

/retest

1 similar comment
@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Jan 30, 2020

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 30, 2020
@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

@fabianofranz can you take a look at this one?

@celebdor
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link
Contributor

@celebdor celebdor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great. This will take care of any other NM dispatcher script as well

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Feb 10, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: celebdor, sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 10, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
#!/bin/bash
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

how is this file different from the mco PR https://github.com/openshift/machine-config-operator/pull/1396/files# ?? I don't see any such file in that PR.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"30-resolv-prepender" - that one adds the DNS VIP to resolv.conf. On the bootstrap host we just need localhost added, which is what this PR does.

var mode int
appendToFile := false
if path.Base(path.Dir(uri)) == "bin" {
if parentDir == "bin" || parentDir == "dispatcher.d" {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also it would be nice if you can include why these files need to have same permissions as bin files?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, a comment would probably be nice. It's a directory of scripts executed by NetworkManager.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

1 similar comment
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@russellb russellb changed the title baremetal: Fix bootstrap local DNS for IPv6 Bug 1801436: baremetal: Fix bootstrap local DNS for IPv6 Feb 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1801436, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1801436: baremetal: Fix bootstrap local DNS for IPv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Feb 10, 2020
@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1801436, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "---" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Feb 10, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1801436, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 5c21552 into openshift:master Feb 11, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1801436 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1801436: baremetal: Fix bootstrap local DNS for IPv6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@russellb: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7 80c458b link /test e2e-aws-scaleup-rhel7
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt 80c458b link /test e2e-libvirt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@russellb
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@russellb: new pull request created: #3092

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. platform/baremetal IPI bare metal hosts platform size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.