Skip to content

Conversation

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor

Vendored dependencies are a result of adding constraint to Gopkg.toml and running dep ensure.

cc @jcpowermac @jstuever

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. label Jan 10, 2020
@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 10, 2020
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@jstuever jstuever removed their assignment Jan 10, 2020
@jstuever
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @wking

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am baffled why shellcheck is failing for this PR but not #2893 when both vendor the same file in question...

[padillon@thinkpad installer]$ diff <(curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/installer/09ec4d2adfea366e60014f2e284c685c65315bf4/pkg/terraform/exec/plugins/vendor/github.com/vmware/govmomi/scripts/license.sh) <(curl -s https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openshift/installer/54f5b4b45375d65c3db7077aaa30f1209758fe7a/vendor/github.com/vmware/govmomi/scripts/license.sh)
[padillon@thinkpad installer]$

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

shellcheck issue resolves. thanks joe!

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jan 13, 2020

/approve

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jan 13, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

9 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jan 13, 2020

merge conflict, so stop the hot looping
/lgtm cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 13, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 14, 2020
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jan 14, 2020

/refresh

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. labels Jan 14, 2020
Running dep ensure against master branch with no changes removes this code.
An override for govmomi is required because terraform-provider-vsphere has not been updated to use 0399353f7859c4775827e454b2cc4f57956dd7ac from govmomi. Therfore, if you use the newest version it will not build.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jan 14, 2020
@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel

The vSphere provider has a transitive dependency on govmomi, which I added, because it has not been updated to include this PR vmware/govmomi@0399353#diff-4c906832aa0dba4d3e0e7075107581f3

Also, this PR removes an unused oVirt dependency which was left in master.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 14, 2020
@jcpowermac
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@mtnbikenc
Copy link
Member

/hold
Tests are churning.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jan 15, 2020

@patrickdillon: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-openstack e21e99f link /test e2e-openstack
ci/prow/e2e-libvirt e21e99f link /test e2e-libvirt

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@patrickdillon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold cancel
/skip
I think churn is resolved...

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jan 15, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a035040 into openshift:master Jan 15, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

9 participants