Skip to content

Conversation

@bfournie
Copy link

@bfournie bfournie commented Mar 8, 2022

Signed-off-by: Zhou Hao [email protected]
(cherry picked from commit 6a48405)

Signed-off-by: Zhou Hao <[email protected]>
(cherry picked from commit 6a48405)
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 8, 2022

@bfournie: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Restart ironic-agent.service when it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bfournie bfournie changed the title Restart ironic-agent.service when it fails Bug 2061977: Restart ironic-agent.service when it fails Mar 8, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 8, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 8, 2022

@bfournie: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.10.0" release, but it targets "4.10.z" instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2061977: Restart ironic-agent.service when it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from hardys and honza March 8, 2022 20:56
@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 10, 2022
@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 11, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bfournie
Copy link
Author

/retest

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 12, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 13, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 14, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 15, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bfournie
Copy link
Author

/retest

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2022

@bfournie: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 16, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 17, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 18, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 11, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 12, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@bfournie
Copy link
Author

/hold
The parent PR that this was backported from did not solve the problem and another fix was needed, see #51. Marking this as /hold, the additional fix will need to be incorporated here if it fixes the problem.
/cc @elfosardo

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from elfosardo June 12, 2022 15:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 12, 2022
@elfosardo
Copy link
Contributor

/unhold
/bugzilla refresh
it's still worth merging this before backporting #51

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 13, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 13, 2022

@elfosardo: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/unhold
/bugzilla refresh
it's still worth merging this before backporting #51

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 14, 2022

@openshift-bot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Recalculating validity in case the underlying Bugzilla bug has changed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@elfosardo
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 14, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 14, 2022

@elfosardo: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2061977, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.z)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 2060968 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENTRELEASE))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 2060968 targets the "4.11.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.11.0
  • bug has dependents

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla ([email protected]), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

/approve
/label backport-risk-assessed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. label Jun 15, 2022
@hardys
Copy link
Contributor

hardys commented Jun 15, 2022

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bfournie, dtantsur, hardys

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 15, 2022
@lshilin-r
Copy link

/label cherry-pick-approved

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2022

@lshilin-r: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers]

Details

In response to this:

/label cherry-pick-approved

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@hardys
Copy link
Contributor

hardys commented Jun 15, 2022

@lshilin-r: Can not set label cherry-pick-approved: Must be member in one of these teams: [openshift-patch-managers]

Seems we're missing the necessary prow config for this repo so I'll add the label until we fix that

@hardys hardys added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Jun 15, 2022
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot merged commit ccd7046 into openshift:release-4.10 Jun 15, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 15, 2022

@bfournie: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Bugzilla bug 2061977 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2061977: Restart ironic-agent.service when it fails

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. backport-risk-assessed Indicates a PR to a release branch has been evaluated and considered safe to accept. bugzilla/severity-medium Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is medium for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants