-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 213
[release-4.6] Bug 1886947: pkg/cvo/sync_worker: Drop "Manifest: ..." logging #471
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-4.6] Bug 1886947: pkg/cvo/sync_worker: Drop "Manifest: ..." logging #471
Conversation
This line is descended from logging we grew way back in 847f71b (pkg/cvo: update to new updatepayload structure, 2018-09-18, openshift#14). But we triggered it recently with 88c222c (install/0000_00_cluster-version-operator_03_deployment: Bump to --v=5, 2020-08-30, openshift#448). Drop the line, because it's noisy spew in the log files, and we can get the manifest content via: $ oc adm release extract --to=manifests $PULLSPEC
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1886900 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1886947. Retitling PR to link against new bug. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1886947, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. 6 validation(s) were run on this bug
DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
vrutkovs
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
|
/hold Until we confirm the fix in 4.7. |
|
/lgtm |
And also the "Status report channel was full" lines. These lines are descended from 961873d (sync: Do config syncing in the background, 2019-01-11, openshift#82). But we triggered it recently with 88c222c (install/0000_00_cluster-version-operator_03_deployment: Bump to --v=5, 2020-08-30, openshift#448). Drop the line, because it's noisy spew in the log files, with all of the small "fraction-completed" bumps: $ grep -c 'sync_worker.go:.*Status change' namespaces/openshift-cluster-version/pods/cluster-version-operator-*/cluster-version-operator/cluster-version-operator/logs/current.log 6265 $ grep -c 'sync_worker.go:.*Status report channel was full' namespaces/openshift-cluster-version/pods/cluster-version-operator-*/cluster-version-operator/cluster-version-operator/logs/current.log 5586 $ grep 'sync_worker.go:.*Status change' namespaces/openshift-cluster-version/pods/cluster-version-operator-*/cluster-version-operator/cluster-version-operator/logs/current.log | tail -n4 2020-10-09T18:21:53.523398340Z I1009 18:21:53.522733 1 sync_worker.go:458] Status change cvo.SyncWorkerStatus{Generation:1, Step:"ApplyResources", Failure:error(nil), Fraction:0.9936, Completed:0, Reconciling:true, Initial:false, VersionHash:"NtNVAdtksjk=", LastProgress:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:0, loc:(*time.Location)(nil)}, Actual:v1.Release{Version:"4.7.0-0.ci.test-2020-10-09-171926-ci-op-8r50wp9l", Image:"registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-8r50wp9l/release@sha256:9c90e64d7ccec7475608daf3e7a21ed749d047a330203734501eb7bc95c65ac8", URL:"", Channels:[]string(nil)}, Verified:false} 2020-10-09T18:21:53.538399862Z I1009 18:21:53.537709 1 sync_worker.go:458] Status change cvo.SyncWorkerStatus{Generation:1, Step:"ApplyResources", Failure:error(nil), Fraction:0.9952, Completed:0, Reconciling:true, Initial:false, VersionHash:"NtNVAdtksjk=", LastProgress:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:0, loc:(*time.Location)(nil)}, Actual:v1.Release{Version:"4.7.0-0.ci.test-2020-10-09-171926-ci-op-8r50wp9l", Image:"registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-8r50wp9l/release@sha256:9c90e64d7ccec7475608daf3e7a21ed749d047a330203734501eb7bc95c65ac8", URL:"", Channels:[]string(nil)}, Verified:false} 2020-10-09T18:21:53.570915921Z I1009 18:21:53.570847 1 sync_worker.go:458] Status change cvo.SyncWorkerStatus{Generation:1, Step:"ApplyResources", Failure:error(nil), Fraction:0.9984, Completed:0, Reconciling:true, Initial:false, VersionHash:"NtNVAdtksjk=", LastProgress:time.Time{wall:0x0, ext:0, loc:(*time.Location)(nil)}, Actual:v1.Release{Version:"4.7.0-0.ci.test-2020-10-09-171926-ci-op-8r50wp9l", Image:"registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-8r50wp9l/release@sha256:9c90e64d7ccec7475608daf3e7a21ed749d047a330203734501eb7bc95c65ac8", URL:"", Channels:[]string(nil)}, Verified:false} 2020-10-09T18:21:53.585933980Z I1009 18:21:53.585786 1 sync_worker.go:458] Status change cvo.SyncWorkerStatus{Generation:1, Step:"", Failure:error(nil), Fraction:1, Completed:10, Reconciling:true, Initial:false, VersionHash:"NtNVAdtksjk=", LastProgress:time.Time{wall:0xbfd8487062ea4a14, ext:2681032283239, loc:(*time.Location)(0x26b0400)}, Actual:v1.Release{Version:"4.7.0-0.ci.test-2020-10-09-171926-ci-op-8r50wp9l", Image:"registry.build01.ci.openshift.org/ci-op-8r50wp9l/release@sha256:9c90e64d7ccec7475608daf3e7a21ed749d047a330203734501eb7bc95c65ac8", URL:"", Channels:[]string(nil)}, Verified:false}
5b41b74 to
eda5997
Compare
|
/lgtm ^ GitHub just noticed me re-injecting the #472 cherry-pick |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, sdodson, vrutkovs, wking The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
/hold cancel |
|
@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Bugzilla bug 1886947 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
This is an automated cherry-pick of #469
/assign vrutkovs