Bug 1835995: ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

[gabemontero]

manual pick after cherrybot failure #277 (comment)

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gabemontero: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gabemontero: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gabemontero: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [gabemontero]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835995, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug

• bug is open, matching expected state (open)
• bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
• bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
• dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1835112 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
• dependent Bugzilla bug 1835112 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
• bug has dependents

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835995: ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[gabemontero]

Ah our old friend forbidden: unable to validate against any security context constraint: [] on the image-eco failure.

I believe @soltysh has cherrypicks for the fix in progress via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829327 ... I see that 4.4.z BZ is in POST, with one PR merged, but the other openshift/cluster-policy-controller#25 still on HOLD.

Any chance on that getting its hold cancelled soon @soltysh ?

Sometimes the image-eco runs are able to avoid the issue if timing is right ... we'll see how lucky we are this week.

@mfojtik FYI

/retest

[gabemontero]

failed to acquire lease

/retest

[openshift-bot]

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

[gabemontero]

/test e2e-aws

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gabemontero: An error was encountered updating to the MODIFIED state for bug 1835995 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 UPDATE bugs SET bug_status = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 544. Bugzilla::Object::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x564446b1cc80)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x564446b1cc80)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564442db9408)') called at (eval 2836) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564445580df0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564445580df0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564444eadf48)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5644434c8580)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x5644434c8580)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564444eadf48)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x564444eadf48)') called at (eval 2836) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2836) line 0 

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835995: ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@gabemontero: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-samples-operator#279, openshift/cluster-samples-operator#272. Bugzilla bug 1835995 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835995: ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[gabemontero]

/cherrypick release-4.3

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@gabemontero: #279 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.3":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/stub/handler.go
M	pkg/stub/imagestreams.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/stub/imagestreams.go
Auto-merging pkg/stub/handler.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/stub/handler.go
Patch failed at 0001 ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@gabemontero: #279 failed to apply on top of branch "release-4.3":

error: Failed to merge in the changes.
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M	pkg/stub/handler.go
M	pkg/stub/imagestreams.go
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging pkg/stub/imagestreams.go
Auto-merging pkg/stub/handler.go
CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in pkg/stub/handler.go
Patch failed at 0001 ensure s390/ppc64le platforms bootstrap as removed following upgrade

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[soltysh]

Any chance on that getting its hold cancelled soon @soltysh ?

I'm waiting for e2e to pass, just re-triggered and dropped the hold, need to wait for tests to pass.

[soltysh]

@gabemontero you should be able to lgtm that other, it's waiting :)