Skip to content

Conversation

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #271

/assign gabemontero

…ectures

file list gets executed on s390x/ppc64le upgrade even when mgmt state removed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered cloning bug for cherrypick for bug 1835112 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 INSERT INTO dependencies (dependson, blocked) VALUES (?,?) at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1315. Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x56444326bb90)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x564443001628)') called at (eval 2342) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x56444250e760)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x56444250e760)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x56444297ad90)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x564443217e80)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x564443217e80)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x56444297ad90)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x56444297ad90)') called at (eval 2342) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2342) line 0 

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1835112: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: Bugzilla bug 1835112 has been cloned as Bugzilla bug 1835995. Retitling PR to link against new bug.
/retitle [release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1835112: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1835112: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures [release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1835112: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures [release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835995, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1835112 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

2 similar comments
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835995, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1835112 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835995, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1835112 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gabemontero, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 14, 2020
@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gabemontero: An error was encountered updating to the POST state for bug 1835995 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 UPDATE bugs SET bug_status = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 544. Bugzilla::Object::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x563e27e1ec78)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x563e27e1ec78)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x563e264d7560)') called at (eval 2343) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x563e26008060)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x563e26008060)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x563e26479678)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x563e278e6d78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x563e278e6d78)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x563e26479678)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x563e26479678)') called at (eval 2343) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2343) line 0 

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 14, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@gabemontero: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1835995, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.z) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.z)
  • bug is in the state NEW, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1835112 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1835112 targets the "4.5.0" release, which is one of the valid target releases: 4.5.0, 4.5.z
  • bug has dependents
Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label May 14, 2020
@sdodson sdodson added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label May 15, 2020
@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented May 15, 2020

/retitle Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures May 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures May 15, 2020
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8ab54f9 into openshift:release-4.4 May 15, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: An error was encountered updating to the MODIFIED state for bug 1835995 on the Bugzilla server at https://bugzilla.redhat.com:

code 32000: Red Hat Bugzilla's database reported a query serialization error. Most likely this occurred because another user or process attempted to change the same data that you were attempting to change. Please press Back and retry the transaction.

 UPDATE bugs SET bug_status = ? WHERE bug_id = ? at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Object.pm line 544. Bugzilla::Object::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x563e271278c0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/Bug.pm line 1168 Bugzilla::Bug::update('Bugzilla::Bug=HASH(0x563e271278c0)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Bug.pm line 851 Bugzilla::WebService::Bug::update('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x563e260110b0)') called at (eval 2340) line 1 eval ' $procedure->{code}->($self, $params) ;' called at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/JSON/RPC/Legacy/Server.pm line 208 JSON::RPC::Legacy::Server::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x563e264f77c8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/JSONRPC.pm line 295 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::JSONRPC::_handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...', 'HASH(0x563e264f77c8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/Bugzilla/WebService/Server/REST.pm line 98 Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::handle('Bugzilla::WebService::Server::REST::Bugzilla::WebService::Bug...') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/rest.cgi line 30 ModPerl::ROOT::Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::var_www_html_bugzilla_rest_2ecgi::handler('Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x563e265c48b8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 eval {...} called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 207 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::run('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x563e26015ea8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/RegistryCooker.pm line 173 ModPerl::RegistryCooker::default_handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler=HASH(0x563e26015ea8)') called at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/ModPerl/Registry.pm line 32 ModPerl::Registry::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x563e265c48b8)') called at /var/www/html/bugzilla/mod_perl.pl line 139 Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler::handler('Bugzilla::ModPerl::ResponseHandler', 'Apache2::RequestRec=SCALAR(0x563e265c48b8)') called at (eval 2340) line 0 eval {...} called at (eval 2340) line 0 

Please contact an administrator to resolve this issue, then request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-samples-operator#272. Bugzilla bug 1835995 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1835995: avoid listing file system content for unsupported architures

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@gabemontero
Copy link
Contributor

/cherrypick release-4.3

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@gabemontero: failed to push cherry-picked changes in GitHub: pushing failed, output: "To https://github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator\n ! [remote rejected] cherry-pick-272-to-release-4.3 -> cherry-pick-272-to-release-4.3 (cannot lock ref 'refs/heads/cherry-pick-272-to-release-4.3': reference already exists)\nerror: failed to push some refs to 'https://openshift-cherrypick-robot:CENSORED@github.com/openshift-cherrypick-robot/cluster-samples-operator'\n", error: exit status 1

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Author

@gabemontero: new pull request created: #273

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.3

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants