-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 222
WIP: Extended TestRouteAdmissionPolicy test timeouts #1051
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Extended TestRouteAdmissionPolicy test timeouts #1051
Conversation
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
cluster install failed |
|
This flake is interesting: https://prow.ci.openshift.org/view/gs/test-platform-results/pr-logs/pull/openshift_cluster-ingress-operator/1051/pull-ci-openshift-cluster-ingress-operator-master-e2e-azure-operator/1783933504581537792 I don't think this is related to openshift/router#555, but it's something easily fixable. |
|
/retest |
|
/test e2e-aws-operator |
cfbf2d2 to
f7bd311
Compare
|
@gcs278: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
Extending the timeout isn't a reasonable fix and I'm doing my testing for this flake in #1049 |
|
@gcs278: Closed this PR. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
Test to see if extending the TestRouteAdmissionPolicy timeout for checking route conditions helps.