Bug 1769691: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed. by openshift-cherrypick-robot · Pull Request #409 · openshift/cluster-image-registry-operator

openshift-cherrypick-robot · 2019-11-06T19:03:53Z

This is an automated cherry-pick of #406

/assign ricardomaraschini

This patch uses the environment variable RELEASE_VERSION to set Operator version if ManagementState is not "Managed". This is introduced now as we may, in some situations, bootstrap the Image Registry Operator with Removed ManagementState.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-06T19:03:55Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1753778, which is invalid:

expected the bug to target the "4.1.z" release, but it targets "4.3.0" instead
expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is MODIFIED instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

[release-4.1] Bug 1753778: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

ricardomaraschini · 2019-11-07T08:43:31Z

/retitle Bug 1769691: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-07T08:43:37Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769691, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1769691: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

ricardomaraschini · 2019-11-07T08:44:18Z

/assign @adambkaplan @dmage

adambkaplan

/lgtm

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-07T14:29:00Z

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: adambkaplan, openshift-cherrypick-robot

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

~~OWNERS~~ [adambkaplan]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

derekwaynecarr · 2019-11-11T04:35:17Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-11T04:35:20Z

@derekwaynecarr: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769691, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1770658 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

derekwaynecarr · 2019-11-11T04:38:36Z

need the dependent 4.2 bug to verify.

derekwaynecarr · 2019-11-11T04:39:36Z

note: the backport in this chain all referenced a common bug. there needed to be a distinct bug for 4.2 versus 4.1. i had cloned a version for 4.2 and set its dependency on the 4.3. and this 4.1 is now dependent on 4.2

adambkaplan · 2019-11-18T18:43:15Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-11-18T18:43:18Z

@adambkaplan: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769691, which is invalid:

expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1770658 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is POST instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

adambkaplan · 2019-12-03T14:43:58Z

/bugzilla refresh

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-03T14:44:04Z

@adambkaplan: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1769691, which is valid.

Details

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot · 2019-12-06T15:15:14Z

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged. Bugzilla bug 1769691 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 1769691: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

openshift-ci-robot assigned ricardomaraschini Nov 6, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 6, 2019

openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Nov 6, 2019

Bug 1753778: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed. #406

Merged

openshift-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 6, 2019

openshift-ci-robot requested review from adambkaplan and dmage November 6, 2019 19:05

openshift-ci-robot changed the title ~~[release-4.1] Bug 1753778: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed.~~ Bug 1769691: Set Version on Operator status even if Removed. Nov 7, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Nov 7, 2019

openshift-ci-robot assigned adambkaplan and dmage Nov 7, 2019

adambkaplan approved these changes Nov 7, 2019

View reviewed changes

openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 7, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 7, 2019

derekwaynecarr added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 11, 2019

openshift-ci-robot removed the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 11, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Nov 11, 2019

derekwaynecarr removed the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Nov 11, 2019

openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Dec 3, 2019

shawn-hurley added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Dec 6, 2019

openshift-merge-robot merged commit 743e890 into openshift:release-4.1 Dec 6, 2019

ricardomaraschini mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2019

Bug 1769691: Report Available when registry is explicitly Removed #414

Closed

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot commented Nov 6, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 6, 2019

Uh oh!

ricardomaraschini commented Nov 7, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 7, 2019

Uh oh!

ricardomaraschini commented Nov 7, 2019

Uh oh!

adambkaplan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 7, 2019

Uh oh!

derekwaynecarr commented Nov 11, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 11, 2019

Uh oh!

derekwaynecarr commented Nov 11, 2019

Uh oh!

derekwaynecarr commented Nov 11, 2019

Uh oh!

adambkaplan commented Nov 18, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Nov 18, 2019

Uh oh!

adambkaplan commented Dec 3, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 3, 2019

Uh oh!

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 6, 2019

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

8 participants