Skip to content

Conversation

@elfosardo
Copy link
Member

The correct flag is --kubeconfig

Also add single line instruction to message to set the KUBECONFIG
environment variable.

The correct flag is --kubeconfig

Also add single line instruction to message to set the KUBECONFIG
environment variable.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from cybertron and markmc April 22, 2022 23:58
@elfosardo
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@elfosardo
Copy link
Member Author

/cc @hardys @dtantsur @andfasano

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from andfasano, dtantsur and hardys April 25, 2022 09:23
@dtantsur
Copy link
Member

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dtantsur

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 25, 2022
@elfosardo
Copy link
Member Author

/retest
packet failures plus a weird timeout

@cybertron
Copy link
Contributor

Ah, I think @dougsland ran into this too. Given that this is not making any functional changes I don't think ci matters.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 25, 2022
@dougsland
Copy link
Collaborator

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 25, 2022

@dougsland: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@dougsland
Copy link
Collaborator

Ah, I think @dougsland ran into this too. Given that this is not making any functional changes I don't think ci matters.

/lgtm

That's correct.

@elfosardo
Copy link
Member Author

can anyone please override the 2 failing CI jobs? this change does not impact any moving part
thanks!

@hardys
Copy link

hardys commented Apr 26, 2022

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-proxy-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-proxy-ipv4

It seems these recently added tests aren't yet passing reliably, @andfasano is investigating and we'll skip them in the meantime

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 26, 2022

@hardys: Overrode contexts on behalf of hardys: ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-proxy-ipv4, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-proxy-ipv6

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-proxy-ipv6
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-proxy-ipv4

It seems these recently added tests aren't yet passing reliably, @andfasano is investigating and we'll skip them in the meantime

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 1fb5202 into openshift-metal3:master Apr 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants