OCPBUGS-74470: bump lodash to ^4.17.23 to address CVE-2025-13465#3410
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Venkata Charan Sunku <vsunku@redhat.com>
|
@sunku5494: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74470, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. DetailsIn response to this: Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: xiaojiey. Note that only openshift-assisted members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
Hi @sunku5494. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a openshift-assisted member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis PR updates lodash dependencies across multiple package.json files in the monorepo to version ^4.17.23 and adds a top-level resolutions field to enforce consistent lodash and lodash-es versions globally. Changes
Estimated Code Review Effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@sunku5494: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74470, which is valid. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: xiaojiey. Note that only openshift-assisted members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/ok-to-test |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ElayAharoni, rawagner, sunku5494 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
bdf6ed3
into
openshift-assisted:master
|
@sunku5494: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74470: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-74470 has been moved to the MODIFIED state. DetailsIn response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Summary by CodeRabbit