Skip to content

OCPBUGS-59345: Use featureSet CustomNoUpgrade#3065

Merged
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intoopenshift-assisted:masterfrom
bfournie:custom-no-upgrade
Jul 24, 2025
Merged

OCPBUGS-59345: Use featureSet CustomNoUpgrade#3065
openshift-merge-bot[bot] merged 2 commits intoopenshift-assisted:masterfrom
bfournie:custom-no-upgrade

Conversation

@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor

@bfournie bfournie commented Jul 22, 2025

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug). Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated network configuration to support custom feature sets and additional feature gates for cluster operations.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 22, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from ElayAharoni and jgyselov July 22, 2025 18:55
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

Details

In response to this:

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug). Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Walkthrough

The change updates the payload sent to the ClustersAPI.updateInstallConfig API call in the NetworkConfigurationForm component. The featureSet value is switched from 'TechPreviewNoUpgrade' to 'CustomNoUpgrade', and a new featureGates array property is added, containing 'NoRegistryClusterOperations=true'.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
libs/ui-lib/lib/ocm/components/clusterConfiguration/networkConfiguration/NetworkConfigurationForm.tsx Modified API payload: changed featureSet value and added featureGates property to the request.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant NetworkConfigurationForm
    participant ClustersAPI

    User->>NetworkConfigurationForm: Triggers onNext
    NetworkConfigurationForm->>ClustersAPI: updateInstallConfig({ featureSet: 'CustomNoUpgrade', featureGates: [...] })
    ClustersAPI-->>NetworkConfigurationForm: Response
    NetworkConfigurationForm-->>User: Continue flow / handle error
Loading

Estimated code review effort

1 (~2 minutes)

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

lgtm

Suggested reviewers

  • ammont82

Poem

A bunny hopped through fields of code,
Tweaked a feature flag, lightened the load.
With a custom set and gates anew,
The payload’s fresh, the bugs are few!
🐇✨

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

libs/ui-lib/lib/ocm/components/clusterConfiguration/networkConfiguration/NetworkConfigurationForm.tsx

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

ESLint couldn't find the config "@openshift-assisted/eslint-config" to extend from. Please check that the name of the config is correct.

The config "@openshift-assisted/eslint-config" was referenced from the config file in "/libs/ui-lib/.eslintrc.cjs".

If you still have problems, please stop by https://eslint.org/chat/help to chat with the team.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 84c2cbc and b68a1c2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • libs/ui-lib/lib/ocm/components/clusterConfiguration/networkConfiguration/NetworkConfigurationForm.tsx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • libs/ui-lib/lib/ocm/components/clusterConfiguration/networkConfiguration/NetworkConfigurationForm.tsx
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Welcome @bfournie! It looks like this is your first PR to openshift-assisted/assisted-installer-ui 🎉

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Jul 22, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2025

Hi @bfournie. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a openshift-assisted member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 22, 2025
@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor Author

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jul 22, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mhanss

Details

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 22, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: mhanss.

Note that only openshift-assisted members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state ASSIGNED, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mhanss

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 23, 2025
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ammont82, bfournie

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 23, 2025
@ammont82
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-4.19

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ammont82: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.19 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ammont82
Copy link
Member

@bfournie we have some format issues. Can you solve it?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 23, 2025
…oUpgrade

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview
features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug).
Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.
@bfournie bfournie force-pushed the custom-no-upgrade branch from 781f9c7 to b68a1c2 Compare July 23, 2025 12:43
@bfournie
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bfournie we have some format issues. Can you solve it?

Yes, @ammont82 I ran prettier against the file, it should be all set now.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mhanss

Details

In response to this:

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug). Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
  • Updated network configuration to support custom feature sets and additional feature gates for cluster operations.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: mhanss.

Note that only openshift-assisted members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

Details

In response to this:

@bfournie: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.20.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.20.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

Requesting review from QA contact:
/cc @mhanss

In response to this:

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug). Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
  • Updated network configuration to support custom feature sets and additional feature gates for cluster operations.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ammont82
Copy link
Member

ammont82 commented Jul 23, 2025

/test all

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@ammont82: The /test command needs one or more targets.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

/test images
/test lint

Use /test all to run all jobs.

Details

In response to this:

/test

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@andfasano
Copy link

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 23, 2025

@andfasano: changing LGTM is restricted to collaborators

Details

In response to this:

/lgtm

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ammont82
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 24, 2025
@ammont82
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-4.20

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ammont82: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.20 in a new PR and assign it to you.

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 74761ba into openshift-assisted:master Jul 24, 2025
11 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bfournie: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-59345 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug). Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
  • Updated network configuration to support custom feature sets and additional feature gates for cluster operations.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ammont82: new pull request created: #3069

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@ammont82: new pull request created: #3070

Details

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@bfournie bfournie deleted the custom-no-upgrade branch July 27, 2025 23:56
ammont82 added a commit to ammont82/assisted-installer-ui that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2025
…oUpgrade (openshift-assisted#3065)

Setting the featureSet to TechPreviewNoUpgrade enabled all TechPreview
features which caused the installation to fail (see details in bug).
Instead CustomNoUpgrade is used with a featureGate specific to OVE UI.

Co-authored-by: Montse Ortega Gallart <ammont82@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants